I have posted here, and received many greatest posts (more than five many times) and really have never attacked anyone without logic and understanding.
So I will give you. that know me and my threads.
I posted in the lounge and got few responses by this community.
I go to court for the arraignment, of an alleged arsonist and I think attempted murderer to see if justice is served.
Here are my links on my story with photographs
and the next link in my reply to this site.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=105&topic_id=3807271orginal link with pictures
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=105&topic_id=3881625This is the story I am submitting to the court tomorrow and have talked to one member of the media tonight..
Monday, August 22, 2005
To all it may concern in regards to the ********r Case who resided at
****** Village Green, Santa Maria California, 93455
The above individual is allegedly charged with Arson and possession of firearm by a convicted felon. The damage the alleged defendant was to 4 structures including his own. I know that according to California law that aggravated arson is when an arsonist affects 5 structures.
I wonder, since this alleged crime took place in the early morning hours of August, 3rd while everyone was sleeping and may have been killed, that a charged of attempted murder in the second degree has not been charged to the defendant.
Neighbors have informed me that I may have saved their lives by helping alert the fire department of the fire. I myself am very lucky to be alive and luckily did not sleep well that night. 190.2. (a) The penalty for a defendant who is found guilty of
murder in the first degree is death or imprisonment in the state
prison for life without the possibility of parole if one or more of
the following special circumstances has been found under Section
190.4 to be true:
(1) The murder was intentional and carried out for financial gain.
(2) The defendant was convicted previously of murder in the first
or second degree. For the purpose of this paragraph, an offense
committed in another jurisdiction, which if committed in California
would be punishable as first or second degree murder, shall be deemed
murder in the first or second degree.
(3) The defendant, in this proceeding, has been convicted of more
than one offense of murder in the first or second degree.
(4) The murder was committed by means of a destructive device,
bomb, or explosive planted, hidden, or concealed in any place, area,
dwelling, building, or structure, and the defendant knew, or
reasonably should have known, that his or her act or acts would
create a great risk of death to one or more human beings.
189. All murder which is perpetrated by means of a destructive
device or explosive, a weapon of mass destruction, knowing use of
ammunition designed primarily to penetrate metal or armor, poison,
lying in wait, torture, or by any other kind of willful, deliberate,
and premeditated killing, or which is committed in the perpetration
of, or attempt to perpetrate ," arson," rape, carjacking, robbery,
burglary, mayhem, kidnapping, train wrecking, or any act punishable
under Section 206, 286, 288, 288a, or 289, or any murder which is
perpetrated by means of discharging a firearm from a motor vehicle,
intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the
intent to inflict death, is murder of the first degree. All other
kinds of murders are of the second degree.
As used in this section, "destructive device" means any
destructive device as defined in Section 12301, and "explosive" means
any explosive as defined in Section 12000 of the Health and Safety
Code.
As used in this section, "weapon of mass destruction" means any
item defined in Section 11417.
To prove the killing was "deliberate and premeditated," it shall
not be necessary to prove the defendant maturely and meaningfully
reflected upon the gravity of his or her act.
The fire was started next to my bedroom wall on the adjacent common wall.
1. The police or fire department interviewed no one in my building at anytime in an official capacity.
2. The victim crime unit had no record of any telephone numbers in that she could contact.
3. I was never asked for my phone number or statement and neither were any of my neighbors by official representatives of Santa Barbara County.
4. Why was the family allowed to move out personal property the following day out of the dwelling at 2496 Village Green the residence of Rocky Ginter if this was a crime scene?
5. The residents found it very alarming to see his truck the next two days parked in front of his garage, which was also released to the family. We did not know that it was not the defendant back again released on bail at that time.
6. If this was a crime scene and the defendant had a record of meth abuse why was this not investigated in his residence?
7. What happened to the propane tank, that was set just outside his front door? I believe that propane is used in meth manufacturing. Never mind the dangers of an explosion from the raging fire.
8. Is there a reason, that in the name of Justice, that many Santa Barbara officials and representatives of the Justice System should not recuse themselves from this case because of their personal relationship to the Ginters familys whose relationship and employment is in the criminal justice system of Santa Maria?
9. I personally have been affected with at least over $10,000 of incurred present and future losses whereas I have provided in the accompanying paper. These costs are very minimal to say the least.
my letter tomorrow with a little shaping up in the morning.
Thank you for your political concern
IChing