Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Confirmed: Able Danger ID of Atta before Bushco Shut it Down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:58 PM
Original message
Confirmed: Able Danger ID of Atta before Bushco Shut it Down
Second Officer Says 9/11 Leader Was Named Before Attacks

By PHILIP SHENON
Published: August 23, 2005
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 - An active-duty Navy captain has become the second military officer to come forward publicly to say that a secret intelligence program tagged the ringleader of the Sept. 11 attacks as a possible terrorist more than a year before the attacks.

The officer, Scott J. Phillpott, said in a statement on Monday that he could not discuss details of the military program, which was called Able Danger, but confirmed that its analysts had identified the Sept. 11 ringleader, Mohamed Atta, by name by early 2000. "My story is consistent," said Captain Phillpott, who managed the program for the Pentagon's Special Operations Command. "Atta was identified by Able Danger by January-February of 2000."

His comments came on the same day that the Pentagon's chief spokesman, Lawrence Di Rita, told reporters that the Defense Department had been unable to validate the assertions made by an Army intelligence veteran, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, and now backed up by Captain Phillpott, about the early identification of Mr. Atta.

Colonel Shaffer went public with his assertions last week, saying that analysts in the intelligence project were overruled by military lawyers when they tried to share the program's findings with the F.B.I. in 2000 in hopes of tracking down terrorist suspects tied to Al Qaeda.

(more)

<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/8/23/134727/558>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm we need a new Pearl Harbor
MIHOP, this is starting to look increasingly like MIHOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. MIHOP is, in the end...
the ONLY rational, logical explaination

IMO :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. already debunked.
just another rovian attempt to smear clinton....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Read the article and analysis after.
You're off base a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Here's the critical part that nails Bush
<snip>
A small group of Defense Intelligence Agency employees ran the Able Danger operation from fall 1999 to February 2001 - just seven months before the terrorist attacks - when the operation was unceremoniously axed, according to a former defense intelligence official familiar with the program.
<snip>

http://www.timesherald.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=15032471&BRD=1672&PAG=461&dept_id=33380&rfi=6

------------------
I remain skeptical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. THERE you go
That's the crucial tidbit that's been missing from all the build-up blame Clinton stories. In February they axed it. The same time they were having meetings about invading Iraq according to Treasury Secy whathisname, and the secret energy panel was meeting to divvy up Iraqi oil fields and Hart-Rudman was going in the circular file.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. you can't possibly be that short sighted?
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 11:07 PM by jsamuel
it has not been debunked

Was is nonsense is the Clinton part of it, but it is a true and much more complicated story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamarama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. "If only we had known their names and seat numbers...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I believe the title was Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United S
tates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. What is that whitish puffy stuff coming from the end of that gun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. no wonder George couldn't leave the house for eight days
nervous breakdown -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. The problem is that even if they were under surveillance...who would
have stopped them from getting on a plane when there was no bomb-making materials.

It was an al-Qaeda mind fuck. And Bushy busy with undoing all the damage neocons had wreaked on the middle east & the USA by supporting elites & strongmen instead of democracy. Cheney was obsessed with 'redoing' his legacy. Rumsfield & Wolfie too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. doesn't matter
just another drip... in all the right places that shows their INCOMPETENCE at BEST or - one day - their aide at worst.

it was an alCIAduh (neoCONs) mind fuck that the fucking crazies have been fantasizing about for decades.


http://images.globalfreepress.com

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. they did nothing
name one thing they did to defend from an attack they knew was coming. they did nothing. they went on VACATION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Clinton NEVER turned down a FISA warrant request, this PC Admin did
lots of questions unanswered and the M$MWs won't dare touch any of it cept for flag waving purposes.

BLOWBACK

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. here is the source the kos article is referring to




A small group of Defense Intelligence Agency employees ran the Able Danger operation from fall 1999 to February 2001 - just seven months before the terrorist attacks - when the operation was unceremoniously axed, according to a former defense intelligence official familiar with the program. The former official asked not to be identified.

Bushco Axes Able Danger Feb. 2001 -
http://www.timesherald.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=15032471&BRD=1672&PAG=461&dept_id=33380&rfi=6



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. good morning
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC