Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic Party subject on NPR talk now:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:13 AM
Original message
Democratic Party subject on NPR talk now:
http://wamu.org/programs/dr/

Wednesday August 24, 2005
Join the show: 1-800-433-8850 (drshow@wamu.org) or contact us
Listen to this show
Show archives will be available approximately one hour after the program ends.

Order a copy
CD | Cassette
10:00 The Democratic Party
Guest host: Steve Roberts

Several political analysts talk about what's going on in the Democratic party and new efforts to build a unified national strategy.

Guests
Matt Bennett, vp for public affairs, Third Way

Ben Brandzel, advocacy director,
MoveOn.org

Donna Brazile, founder and managing director of Brazile and Associates

Listen to this show
Show archives will be available approximately one hour after the program ends.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats need to stop trying to have a "unified" message....
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 09:22 AM by kentuck
Just say what they believe and if another Democrat disagrees, let them disagree. I think it is an over-rated "strategy" that we have to be united on any one subject. For example, the war in Iraq. Nobody is united on this issue. By attempting to be united on one position only paralyzes the Party. Speak up if you are against it. The voters will decide who is on the right side of the issue. If you wish to support Bush, go ahead. But don't expect everybody to get behind you. And vice-versa. Just stand up for what you believe and speak up. Stop being manipulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ MEW Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. do you remember the mid term elections in 1994
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 09:46 AM by DJ MEW
Gingrich and friends came up with a unified message for all republicans to use all over the country, and it worked. That was how the repubs got in to power.

I totally agree with you about how it should be, but too many people want to believe that the party they endorse when they go vote has a unified plan for the country. It is easier then having to think for your self about how you want the country to be.

Unfortunately we need to have some kind of unified plan or core value system or something to show the voters that the Democrats know what we are doing and are capable.

Edit:
Happy Birthday to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The only problem
is some dems answer to a "contract with America" is it will look the same with a few words in it to look like a progressive direction. It's hard to con those that have a problem with the way things are going and looking for a real change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And happy birthday
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 09:53 AM by mmonk
Of course the republicans used to lose when they went along with dems when they were in the minority (just like us now).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think we may have misinterpreted that....
The fact that they were speaking out against the Democrats was the important issue and the fact that the Democrats were not effectively defending themselves, gave the Repubs the landslide in the House. It is the indecision and the silence that hurts Democrats more than a divided message, in my opinion. It would be preferable to have a unified message, such as over Social Security, but silence is not preferable to a divided message, in my opinion. Because we do not know how many people might agree with the message, even if it is presently in the minority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC