Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The religionist sickness is spreading, even in Massachusetts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:48 AM
Original message
The religionist sickness is spreading, even in Massachusetts
From pastor to political activist
His church booming, he wants to spread the word statewide

By Maria Cramer, Globe Staff | August 24, 2005

(snip)

But (Pastor Roberto) Miranda is not satisfied. He has written a master plan to ''reclaim the state of Massachusetts for Jesus Christ" and penetrate a culture he feels is being lost to promiscuity, activist judges, and the legalization of same-sex marriage. He is organizing Protestant ministers and Christian activists around the state and encouraging them to bring modern marketing techniques to the church.

The 17-page treatise appeals to evangelical leaders to work together to ''proceed systematically to penetrate and reconquer" institutions of culture, business, and politics in a state that he said has become ''saturated with a godless, secular outlook."

(snip)

''I called together these key leaders to talk about how could we put together an initiative to sell our product better, to be more relevant, and to communicate the message of the gospel in ways that would be a lot more digestible to the general public," Miranda said during in an interview in his spacious office overlooking Northampton Street.

He wrote the plan more than a year ago in the aftermath of the legalization of same-sex marriage. The vitriol he said he witnessed between both sides inspired him to draw up the plan, which calls on Christian leaders to unify and strengthen the church, recruit high school and college students, and imbue them with a ''clear, militant Christian worldview," and increase the influence of Christianity in the arts, media, and politics.


http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/08/24/from_pastor_to_political_activist/?page=full

Am I a "militant atheist"? Fuck yes, I am.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Am I a "militant atheist"? Fuck yes, I am.
YOU ROCK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. "militant atheist"...
Well, you gotta believe in something!

At least he didn't use an oxymoron like...
"Militant Pacifist".

Yikes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh, wait!
He did!

"militant Christian"

I found an oxymoron! What did I win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:53 AM
Original message
How is militant Xian an oxymoron?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, in some sectors... It's reality.
I wasn't aware J.C. advocated or practiced militantism.

So, it's an oxymoron due to the fact militantism is being
paired with the rumored teachings of a non-militant leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword"- Christ, Jesus H.; 33 AD
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 10:10 AM by IanDB1
But to bring a sword
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/But_to_bring_a_sword

"I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword" is one of several controversial statements reported of Jesus in the Bible. The saying has been understood in several ways, by Christians and non-Christians, to support several mutually-incompatible conclusions. Its main significance in that context is that it is often offered as evidence that Jesus advocated violence—a view that is repugnant to many Christians.

The "full" quote, according to the NASB translation of the Bible, reads (Jesus speaking):

"Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household." (Matthew 10:34-36, NASB)

Another, similar, quote reads (Jesus speaking):

"Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth? I tell you, no, but rather division; for from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three..." (Luke 12:51-52 NASB)

More:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/But_to_bring_a_sword
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Well... Obviously we could get into a days long flame war about this.
However, I choose to see most religious leaders as peace loving.

Excluding of course... Radical Cleric Robertson and friends.

Sorry, I said anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Religion went downhill the first time someone said...
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 10:35 AM by IanDB1
"There is a reward in the afterlife, but you can't have it UNLESS..."

The only true and worthwhile religion is Pastafarianism.

I have been Touched By His Noodly Appendage.

Flying Spaghetti Monsterism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. militant is not militaristic
It means "combative, aggressively active, especially in support of a (usually political) cause" and combative means "ready or eager to fight"

So that sounds like DU, being active and forceful, ready to challenge the powerful and ready to answer their attacks. That is a tradition that goes back at least to Moses, challenging the Pharoah, Elijah challenging Jezebel, Nathan challenging Saul and David (or was that Samuel for Saul), John the Baptist challenging Herod, Paul and the apostles spreading the Gospel. And so on. I just opened my Bible to Jeremiah, and found in 38:4 that apparently Jeremiah was not "supporting the troops"

"Then the officials said to the king, 'This man (Jeremiah) should be put to death. He is discouraging the soldiers who are left in this city, as well as all the people, by the things he is saying to them. This man is not seeking the good of these people but their ruin.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Your dictionary and mine seem to be at odds on that...
\Mil"i*tant\, a. militare to be soldier: cf. F. militant. See {Militate}.]
Engaged in warfare; fighting; combating; serving as a
soldier. -- {Mil"i*tant*ly}, adv.

At which command the powers militant . . . Moved on in
silence. --Milton.

It's also synonymous with: Unpeaceful.

*********************

What you say about Jeremiah is interesting.

You might find this a worthwhile reference:

http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. I show those as 2nd definitions
the first being "vigorously active" Random House 1966 uses "a militant group of reformers" as an example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. "He" who?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
23.  "(Pastor Roberto) Miranda"
The article refers to this person as a "he".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Ah, I see.
I was confused, because his use of the phrase "militant christian" was one of the first things in the article that popped out at me.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. If you must be a "militant atheist" to counter "militant christianity"...
You must!

Sad how things have come to this.

If Christianity is such a wonderful idea... Then how
come they have to resort to militant tactics to convince
others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. "How come they have to resort to militant tactics?" An excellent question.
My position is this: I didn't become their enemy until they declared me so.

But then if it's fight them or watch my values perish, then fight them I will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. an extremist mullah coming to a church near you...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Imagine... substitute the words "muslim" and "islamic" in this article.
:scared:

Scary shit, no matter what "flavor" of fundamentalist is doing the raving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Massachusetts is too cranky
This state is too grouch and independent minded to succumb to the blandshments of the Religious Right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. "It can't happen here," is the same thing they said in Germany. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hell, we said it HERE
30 years ago, these guys were regarded as comical loons. Nobody's laughing anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I would disagree
Not on the general crankiness part (which I suspect is weather-induced ;-)) but on the potential success of the message. There are plenty of churches in MA, there's a tradition of religious fervor tracing back to Salem, the Puritans, the founding of Christian Science, and there's a big evangelical community amongst recent immigrants in particular. The Great Awakening also had its roots in Boston and Northhampton under Jonathan Edwards, author of 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God'.

The MA religious landscape has been heavily roiled due to the chaos & idiocy of the Catholic Church in the wake of the sex abuse scandal, and I suspect there's a decent amount of disgruntled Catholics who would be open to a new 'militant Christian' message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. People are religious but libertarian about it
Massachusetts (New England) does have a strong tradition of ingrained religion.

But that's one of the reasons I think it will be harder for nutjob fundamentalism to take serious hold.

Over the centuries we've had to work out religious differences already. At this point, while many people are religious, I think they also have a libertarian "live and let live" attitude about attempts to impose one set of religious values on everyone.

The problems with the Catholic Church have upset the applecart, but from what I can observe, it has made catholics more detached from the church, rather than seeking a more militant alternative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Anyone remember where THIS picture came from?
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 10:31 AM by IanDB1

Bigotry: It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why are judges who interpret the law "activist judges"?
There is no legal reason to deny same-sex couples legal marriage. The judges who have ruled on this...such as those in Massachusetts...were merely doing their jobs.

Sorry...a bit OT. But I've always wondered about why judges are demonized by people like Robertson for doing what they're supposed to be doing.

BTW: I'm a militant agnostic. Does that count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. They say we steal their religion, but what do THEY steal?
That always gets me, that "taking back" idea, as if we've stolen their religion, when in all reality, they're already the majority, with no fears of religious persecution, and further, they seek to steal FAR more than religion from those that don't follow theirs.

Religion is the LEAST of what the religious right seeks to take from all "others".

All other rights and freedoms are subject to biblical interpretation. They want to take away the CONSTITUTION from the rest of us to have their "religion". Toss away the idea of religious freedoms altogether; you're free to be Christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. Whenever these folks
start this, I look up in the New Testament all the passages Christ devoted to same sex marriages, activist judges and promiscuity. Oh that's right, I can't find any because they aren't there!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. They're sorta cute when they get mad....
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 10:24 AM by Lexingtonian
but I don't see it working. If he tries this game in South Boston he'll be breaking up poor black churches. If he goes elsewhere in Boston he'll get overrun by fervent ex-Catholics but they tend to be on the elderly side and rather committed to infighting. The only place where there's the money for this kind of an aggressive effort (assuming Miranda actually means it) is in suburbia, where his quasi-Pentacostalism just isn't going to fly.

It doesn't add up to anything serious because it can't.

Oh, the corporate business model for churches...it seems like this fella, surprisingly, doesn't know anything about megachurches.

This isn't the first major effort at the Boston area. There were more of them during the Eighties. Around 1995 it all began to fizzle a bit. If we didn't have Midwesterners moving to the area and Asian immigrants they'd be in full-blown decline. Many late Gen X and most Gen Yer white kids are simply not going back to the churches.

The wierdest phenomenon we're having right now in New England is the Southern Baptists sending a lot of their Southern surplus ministers to take jobs in the rural churches that are too small and poor to attract others. It's making for a bit of cultural wierdness; I can't tell how well or badly it's working out. Then again, these churches exist largely so the elderly folks know they'll live out their days and die among friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. Cardinal Law was in Boston. I'd say the sickness has always been there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. Most interesting post, and right in my back yard
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 12:32 PM by paineinthearse
Wonder if pillaries, stocks and witch hanging/burnings are in the plan?

Nominated.

I posted the Globe article in the Massachusetts forum (with some background information about the good pastor), where it is getting some interesting comments - http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=158&topic_id=6021&mesg_id=6021
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. the church as a corporation
Miranda, a Princeton University graduate who received a doctorate in Romance languages at Harvard University, said that in order to penetrate the culture, evangelical leaders must think of the church as a corporation.

''Any institution that is going to be effective needs to be more communicative about the product it's trying to sell and find its market," he said. ''Right now the market is a 21st century, secularly oriented community that is skeptical of what kind of practical services the church can offer."

------

I think it says a lot about the decline of supernaturalism that religionists think they have to emulate corporations to be successful. The corporate ethos is almost diametrically opposed to anything Jesus is claimed to have said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC