Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rowley Responds to Criticism of Her Recent Trip to Crawford, Texas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:41 PM
Original message
Rowley Responds to Criticism of Her Recent Trip to Crawford, Texas
Colleen Rowley: American Patriot. Thanks, Colleen!

http://www.coleenrowley.com/news.php

Rowley Responds to Criticism of Her Recent Trip to Crawford, Texas
August 25, 2005

Coleen Rowley recently visited "Camp Casey" outside of George W. Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas with Minnesota State Senator Becky Lourey to offer moral support to those who have lost loved ones in the war in Iraq. The vigil was initiated by Cindy Sheehan, whose son Casey, was killed in Iraq in 2004. Sheehan and other families of soldiers, including Lourey, requested a meeting face-to-face with President Bush in order to ask him to explain what "noble cause" their children have died for. Minnesota State Senator Becky Lourey is the mother of Chief Warrant Officer Matthew Lourey, who was killed May 26, 2005 in Iraq.

However, the trip was harshly criticized by right-wing pundits and bloggers, who characterized the mothers and other protesters outside President Bush's ranch as, among other things, "left-wing radicals" and "anti-war extremists."

In an interview with Inside Minnesota Politics, reporting directly from the camp, Rowley explained that the group is actually comprised to a large extent of military families from all over the nation who are "reflective of mainstreet America." She also said claims that her trip was politically motivated were unfounded, because she had publicly objected to launching the war in Iraq -- well before she decided to run for Congress. Rowley said such criticisms were trying to falsely marginalize her when, according to most national polls, her views about the Iraq war are shared by a majority of Americans. Rowley also said that Sheehan's vigil has, if nothing else, put an end to the "fear-induced silence" that has thus far constrained so many Americans from speaking out and asking the hard questions.

Rowley had warned in a "whistle-blower" letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller in February of 2003 that launching the war in Iraq would prove counterproductive to efforts to contain international terrorism. In her February 26, 2003 letter to FBI Director Mueller, Rowley explained that "the diversion of attention from al-Qaeda to our government's plan to invade Iraq (would be) a step (that) in all likelihood would bring an exponential increase in the terrorist threat to the U.S. at home and abroad" and "the bottom line is this: we should be deluding neither ourselves nor the American people that there is any way the FBI, despite the various improvements (being) implemented, will be able to stem the flood of terrorism that will likely head our way in the wake of an attack on Iraq."

Since the war in Iraq began, both US and British intelligence services have noted a substantial increase in terrorist attacks around the world. Intelligence studies also point out that Iraq has become the new training ground for terrorists, that is, for foreign "jihadists" pouring into Iraq who had no previous history of violence. U.S. State Department figures show the number of significant terrorist incidents soaring: from 2003's 20-year record of 175 incidents that killed 625 people -- to 651 such attacks that killed 1,907 people in 2004. Although a change in counting methodology may have accounted for some of the increase, Rowley believes that this data makes it impossible for the Bush Administration to argue that they are "winning the war" on terrorism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Way to go Colleen!
:bounce:

I hope she gets into office in Minnesota. She's a very strong determined woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree!
Hi bushwentawol! I have not seen much of you this sumemr. Hope all is well.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hello kat!
Hope all is well with you too. :hi:

:hug:

I'm just my usual quiet self. :)
I need to change that I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Unfortunately she doesn't have a position
on what to do next in Iraq, or she's very poor at articulating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I'm interested to hear why you are saying that
I'm sure the only sane policy will be to withdraw and she has done a good job of representing herself so far. With Nora O'donnell and the other asshat pushing her around, she didn't blow her stack and that is to her credit.
They deserved an earful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. On a scale of 1 to 10
her presentation was worth a 3.

Mark Williams was full of shit. On many, many points she could have ripped him apart, were she prepared. Most importantly: Mark asked her point blank what she would do in Iraq, and she couldn't answer. Weeeeak. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. That *$%^&**
never even gave her a chance to form a complete sentence. She should have ripped them both, but not flying off the handle under those circumstances should get her at least a 5 or 6. The cards were stacked against her and she knew that. She is one very brave lady to stand up to the neocons and the FBI, etc, etc.
:9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Hope at some point though that she adds herself to the list on nswbc.org
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 01:03 PM by calipendence
It's good to see her be forward and supporting of Cindy Sheehan, and not feeling the need to apologize for it. Hopefully that will increase her courage to be a voice for us and the truth and be more a part of things everyplace, like the nswbc.org, National Security Whistleblower's Organization headed by Sibel Edmonds (where she initially was identified in news reports as being a supporter, but currently is not on their list on the site). I can understand that she doesn't want to be "marginalized" by the right, but the day that she can feel that she can put her name there is the day that I think we've beaten back this wave of intimidation by the right against progressive politicians and media.

Her support of that organization would also help many other security whistleblowers come forward and get rid of this crime family through more of us giving it credibility!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I'll ask her to add it to her site.Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. she was yelled at on Hardball earlier this week--by mark williams --
I think that was his name----It was a terrible segment--with Norah O'donnell chiming in (she was the host as Tweety was still on vacation Monday)--referring to camp casy people as extreemists!!

She did well considering the Mark guy who literally kept yelling at her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I saw that
The stupid guy kept cutting her off and yelling freeperisms.
Norah didn't help much either with the extremist comment that Colleen straightened her out on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Here's the Hardball transcript. Colleen held up just fine considering
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9051970/
I think Colleen did well despite being attacked, insulted, misrepresnted and cut off repeatedly by Williams.

Williams' comments were off-base. He should not be allowed to comment on national TV.

Some telling exerpts:
MARK WILLIAMS, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: Well, the pontifications of a self-serving Democrat political candidate notwithstanding, this tour is neither anti-Cindy Sheehan, nor is it pro-war.

ROWLEY: Mark, if you don't mind, you're making the case that Cindy Sheehan is hurting the morale of our troops?
snip

WILLIAMS: She is aiding and abetting the enemies of this country and the people who killed her son. Right now, Casey Sheehan is spinning in his grave.

O'DONNELL: Coleen, can I get your response to that?

ROWLEY: Well, I actually was called a traitor even for speaking out before the war was begun and cautioning officials that it would prove counterproductive.

If we fall into this other speaker's mode, we simply will not have a country that is acting judiciously, because we will all simply have to be quiet. We won't have our freedom of speech either and none of us will be able to challenge incorrect and actually very dangerous policies.

snip
WILLIAMS: Well, you know, staying the course, staying the course has brought us free elections. It's got a constitutional convention under way, more free elections coming up, an Iraqi stock market that didn't exist before, no more innocents being slaughtered by weapons of mass destruction, no more people, no more soccer teams being executed because they lose a game. Stay the course? ... That's exactly what we're doing. And that's why we're doing it. What would you have us do, lady? Would you have us leave the place and let the Iraqis leave it to them?

O'DONNELL: Mark, let me allow Coleen to respond.

ROWLEY: I don't think that most Americans do think that staying the course at this juncture has any potential for success.

WILLIAMS: Oh, God forbid they should have a country with a constitution and a representative democracy. We can't possibly have that.

What an absolute out-of-control jerk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I totally agree
You can see the length of his speech compared to Rowley's sentence. He tried to intimidate and overrun the entire interview which he did. He almost got O'Donnell to be sympathetic, but she just stayed pathetic instead and let the discussion? be ruled by the freaky dude.
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nominated! She is one smart, tough cookie. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Colleen Rowley: A profile in courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. I bet that these two paid their own way, not charging it to the taxpayers
like some people we know . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
17. "left-wing radicals" and "anti-war extremists."
Aren't these the same words they use to describe terrorist? Is anybody else worried about these analogies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. They think they are cute with their labels
Really just signals that they have lost their argument. Sad thing is though that the 29% really eat it up and become dangerous.
They are making it an Us-vs-Them division, thanks to the divider/non-uniter*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC