Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ack! MSRNC Question of the Day!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:18 AM
Original message
Ack! MSRNC Question of the Day!
http://msnbc.com/news/778726.asp

"Leak Uproar: Is it a Political witch hunt?"

the whores, the whores.... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. 545 responses, 49% yes a witchhunt
51% no - DUers - vote and be counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. MSGOP has been sucking GOP tit for a while now
Thats why I ignore their bias as much as I can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is right up there with Wolf's "Democrats smell blood.."
It is more than a bias. A bias is more subtle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sticky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. How could it be a political witch hunt?
It's a crime - The question alone is bogus!

Leak Uproar: Is it a political witch hunt?

Yes 49%

No 51%

http://www.msnbc.com/news/778726.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No 56% Yes 44% (edited to fix numbers, had them reversed)n/t
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 09:30 AM by JohnyCanuck
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. I sent them a few pithy comments.
which they will ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. I love watching them show their true colors.....
They are so loyal to the White House they are forced to defend treason! This is not going away, and they are freaking out. The White House has hired its own lawyer and says there is no need for a special prosecutor. Beginning to feel a lot like Watergate. Deja vu all over again. Sweet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. I gave my feedback to them too.
I hope they post it....


Judy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Must be Nachman's idea
he wants this story to die
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You got that right.....
He's put his fat ass on the air more yesterday than I've seen in a month of Sundays! He wants to control this personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. saw that too...
in addition, he kept insisting Plame was an analyst! So many whores...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. kick
:kick:
Other thread a dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I realized my thread was a dupe
a while ago and asked mods to delete it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. well that set off my rant valve!!
this is what I sent them:

your 'question' is nothing but RW partisan spin.

the crime (not 'leak') was a politically motivated act. but since it involves republicans--it's not the biggest news story since Watergate, it's a 'witch hunt'... you are pathetic.

the level of your whoring to the criminals in the WH is staggering. (but, then again, you actually 'pay' Scarborough. you have no credibility)

this story is not about a "leak" and if you're really unable to understand that it's treason which threatens national security has been committed, please shut down your worthless network and your worthless website so you can spend more time kissing republican butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. excellent nos!
and you are right, it is not a leak it is TREASON!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. My comment
A Witch hunt? An undercover agent and her network was compromised for political reasons. Wanting to find the person who gave aid and comfort to our enemies is not a witch hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Ironic that the WH leaks the name of the specialist in wmd's and
of course compromising her contacts and co-workers and then continue to insist that the war in Iraq was about wmd's.

It is extremely UNPATRIOTIC to out a CIA agent. Are the yes people totally out to lunch? Wake up and smell the napalm you morons!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. 58% say no now with 1963 votes cast
:shrug: They are making it political I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. it's 52% YES now.......... vote! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. I voted
but also let them know that their survery experts are demonstrably biased and need to take some basic courses in objective survey construction. Words like "uproar" give it away. Incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I left a comment
I think this question is pure republican spin.
When was it you decided that you would give up ethics?
You are fronting for criminals, and you will be held accountable.

Oh, and the freeps are banging this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Voted
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 02:28 PM by ewagner
Yes is taking over..........

on edit: I think we're seeing the FAUXATION of MSNBC which Nachman has been taking personal control of recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. Now down to 51%.
Sometimes I wonder why I spent so many years teaching history, critical thinking...I hope none of my ex-students are falling for this s***.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. "One would hope that blowing a CIA agent's cover might create at least...
...as much of an uproar as blowing a president's...well, I'm sure you get the idea."

That's the comment I submitted where it says, "Tell us what you think about today's question."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. voted
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC