On January 17, 1961, President Eisenhower addressed the American People from the Oval Office, via radio.
He stated
"Together we must learn how to compose difference, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose."More than 44 years later, it is obvious America has chosen arms rather than "intellect and decent purpose" in willful pursuit of the property and resources of others.
It is time to reflect on President Eisenhower's warnings and on the fact that they have gone unheeded.
It is time to reflect on the devastation America has caused, and reject the use of our citizens, of our capital for propagating war and the incitement of others to choose war.
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence - economic, political, even spiritual - is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought,
by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes.
We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.<clip>
Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we - you and I, and our government -
must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow.
We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage.
We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller,
must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.
Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength.
That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose difference, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment.
As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war - as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years - I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight. ...
But, so much remains to be done.From
Farewell Radio and Television Address to the American People by President Dwight D Eisenhower on January 17, 1961
Link:
http://wikisource.org/wiki/Military-Industrial_Complex_Speech It is time for all Americans to realize that we have an alternative to war. And we have every reason to select the alternative.As Iraq's constitutional process breaks down, the blame for whatever follows will fall on America's head. This "test of democracy" in the Middle East no doubt
is bound to fail, given that Iraq-watchers long before the U.S. invasion warned that the Sunni, Shiite, and Kurdish factions were not a nation-state but a confederation held together by terror and armed might under Saddam.
I imagine we will see a flood of posts condemning the Bush administration for its folly, manipulation, self-deception, and ideological blindness, as it well deserves. I'd only like to raise a deeper question. When is America going to take peace seriously? I aim this question not at the war-mongering baddies but at the good people who never wanted this war and feel more justified every day.
<clip>
Iraq was in reality a test of war, and it passed. More war is in the offing, and by passively allowing this conflict to happen, the good people helped pave the way for our next invasion or intervention. Passivity, not blood-thirstiness, is going to lead us into a hugely militarized future.
America's addiction to war has just received another fix. The Bush administration and its cohorts don't care if this war is won or lost. Either outcome will reinforce the ethos of war and cut off any alternative.
Kerry and the Democratic National Committee knew that his only strategic option was to vote for the Iraqi war originally, because no anti-war candidate has a chance in a general election. That act of self-contradiction didn't win Kerry the Presidency, however, even against one of the weakest opponents imaginable. I think we should realize that liberals and moderates are in a lose-lose situation.
Stop passively assenting to the U.S. as a war power and stand up for your belief in peace. You might be surprised, as I have been for the past five years how many people will stand up with you. To those who believe we can create a critical mass of peace consciousness,
I recommend they visit www.www.anhglobal.org (Alliance for the New Humanity).From
Iraq Wasn't a Test of Democracy. It Was a Test of War by Deepak Chopra on August 26, 2005
Link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deepak-chopra/iraq-wasnt-a-test-of-dem_b_6283.html We have 44 years of compelling evidence that it is time for America to choose a different option than war.In fact, the only way a 'lasting peace' will happen is if "We The People" make peace our priority and demote war to the bottom of the list of options.
'Defensive military action' should be found well below options like thought, thinking harder, diplomacy, leverage, sanctions, not supporting dictators, not supporting theocracies, not supporting royal kingdoms, .... .
We can readily
defend America with a fraction of the scale of military we currently have, if our purpose is
defense, and not preemptive wars of aggression and imperialism.
Our strongest defense resides in our ability to nurture, over decades, the realization that America means ethics, it means respect for the law, and it leads as a result of being an innovative, trusted, strategic partner and problem solver.
We need to heed President Eisenhower's sage advice
"Together we must learn how to compose difference, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose." We can do this, my fellow Americans.
We just need to make the decision that peace is our objective, and behave accordingly.Peace.