Belt Way Boys regular just called Cindy a Crackpot (Fox News)

[Catherine Vincent]

What an ass. Way to go what ever your name is. Is that what you call mothers of soldiers that died in your hero's war? What is it about these bushbots? People protest and say things about their president and they turn around and call ya names.

[kliljedahl]

1. You can watch FOX?

You're a better man than I am cat_girl25. I just ate, can't go there.

[Catherine Vincent]

2. I usually don't watch.

But I've been home all day periodically watching their updates on Katrina and I heard that. I try and watch Fox News every now and then but usually switch the channel after a few minutes because it's hard to take their bullshit.

[kliljedahl]

5. I rely on these guys, no stomach for it myself

http://www.newshounds.us

[Imagevision]

3. Beltway boyz will soon learn Cindy to be their worst nightmare!

when she arrives in Washington - welcome to the movement chumps!

http://downingstreetmemo.com/

[Webster Green]

4. Ha Ha!....I just saw that asshat!

He said there were no "ordinary Americans" there, just wierdo's.

I never watch Faux, but (while listening to brad blog), I was surfing around looking for footage of the dueling rallies in Crawford.

[RightSightBrightLite]

6. WHY ad-hominen defamation? DisInfo War on American People

a war of words...semantic attack

a war of information to control and condition the domestic population.

one of my top inspiring writers Butler Shaffer has a 'bead' on the motives and modus-operandi of those apartchiks with forked-tounges to infect minds and poison & pollute public airwaves and reasonable political discourse.

those who lust mammon and gorge themselves on power, are moldable shells in shameless service of the 'system' , the 'man' a 'regressive' old, corrupt , outdated form of human.

Cindy has awakened the long-anesthetized souls of many Americans. Spirituality is a quality found only within individuals, as the expression of the inner nature of living beings. It is an attribute alien to institutional hierarchies, whose interests are confined to the physical and mechanistic world. To men and women who have adopted an institutionalized perspective, the non-material is immaterial. This is why you find little, if any, support for Cindy coming from corporations, political agencies, the major news media, or organized churches or universities. It is individuals who have responded to Cindy’s stance.

To What Is Cindy a Threat?
by Butler Shaffer
http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer117.html

~~~What has Cindy Sheehan done to warrant the unfocused rage and vicious name-calling to which she has been subjected? What is the nature of her "offense" that has led conservative war-whoopers to heap untold abuse upon her for daring to exercise what they pretend to "defend" – even as they work to destroy its expression – namely, individual liberty?

She has been referred to as a "crackpot," an "America hater," a "tragedy slut," a "media whore," an "anti-Semite," and a "traitor," by various conservative talk-show hosts or websites. One allegedly Christian website went so far as to say that "traitors deserve firing squads." One can buy T-shirts reading "Sheehan is Nuts," or read a seemingly endless flow of non-sequiturs having nothing to do with her stated position. She has been condemned as a "Leftist," and for her association with Michael Moore. With the same sense of irrelevance that permeates both Congress and the media, Republican congressman Duncan Hunter observed that some of her supporters looked like "aging hippies." Nor does one have to wait long, on any Reich-wing talk show, to hear the refrain that offers their unassailable response to all dissenting views: "if you don’t like it here, why don’t you go to Africa or Asia?"

At her Camp Casey site, over five hundred crosses bearing the names of soldiers killed in Iraq were knocked over by one of Cindy’s critics in a pickup truck; an act that received little criticism from the allegedly Christian war defenders. A neighbor of George Bush twice fired his shotgun into the air in the presence of Cindy’s supporters; an act which, had it been engaged in by any of the antiwar people, would have resulted in massive arrests and Bill O’Reilly bellowing accusations of "terrorism" and Cindy’s ties to Al Qaeda!

~~~Cindy Sheehan does constitute a threat, not to America, but to the totalitarian forces that insist on crushing the spirit of peace and liberty in order that they might dominate the American people. History is awash with examples of men and women eagerly cooperating with those who would subjugate and destroy them. As Pastor Niemoller’s words so eloquently remind us, cristalnacht was neither the first nor last instance of people turning upon – rather than coming to the defense of – their neighbors when under attack by the state.

Sadly, what makes Cindy such a poignant figure is the fact that she is such a lone public voice in opposition to the brown-shirted mentality that has taken over in this country. That there are many individuals who have expressed the same concerns for peace, liberty, and the ending of the Iraqi war, is obvious. LewRockwell.com, Antiwar.com, and a long list of names that include Vidal, Rockwell, Higgs, Lapham, Pilger, Raimondo, Sobran, Hedges, Cockburn, Kwiatkowski, Woods, Bock, DiLorenzo, Bovard, Conger, Hersh, and many others that would turn this into far-too-lengthy a paragraph, are outspoken critics of this regime. But while these people find expression in the Internet and some of the print media, Cindy has galvanized widespread latent resentment to vicious statism and brought it to the surface.

~~~But there are those who question the rationale for societies operating on the premise of unquestioning obedience to self-styled emperors; rulers who enjoy the unrestrained exercise of police powers and military authority. America and Great Britain are two Western nations succumbing to this totalitarian madness. The first step, in this absolutist subjugation of erstwhile free people, will be to restrain free expression and the questioning of state policies.

Hillary Clinton proposed such chains upon the Internet a few years ago, suggesting that a "gatekeeper" – guess who – control what gets communicated through this medium. Other totalitarian minds– such as Bruce Fein, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, and New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman – have proposed the punishment or blacklisting of those who engage (in Fein’s words) in "speech likely to motivate terrorism." "Reasonable suspicion" of "sympathy with terrorism" would seem enough to satisfy Fein’s test for calling in the state!


Friedman’s proposed government blacklist – what he terms a "War of Ideas Report" – would include "excuse makers" (i.e., those who "tell us why imperialism, Zionism, colonialism or Iraq explains why the terrorists acted"). According to public opinion polls, most Americans would appear on Friedman’s blacklist, as they see a connection between the Iraq war and terrorist activity!

also see
The Practice of Ritual Defamation


How Attitudes, Opinions and Beliefs are

Controlled in Democratic Societies
by Laird Wilcox, Professor at Kansas University

@ http://naturalperson.com/New%20Website/5%20Advance/InLine%202/Practiceof%20Defamation.htm
~~~~~

a ruling 'class?'

crackpot

..caught on tape!

hi! there cat_girl two-five....peace out sis

[wli]

7. no Zionism, imperialism, or colonialism needed to explain false flag n/t