Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What theory, in your opinion, best explains these different outcomes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:19 PM
Original message
What theory, in your opinion, best explains these different outcomes?
When people are asked if they are willing to have their taxes raised, they say No. But if they are asked whether they want (e.g.) universal single-pay healthcare EVEN IF their taxes go up because of it, they say Yes.

What theory, in your view, best accounts for that, and why?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. People are ignorant
and should not be allowed to make important decisions for themselves.

Especially in Murka, they usually make choices that contradict their own best interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cjbuchanan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. You have to give people a good reason
If you just ask someone if they want their taxes to go up, most will say no. It is like aasking people if they want to pay $1 or $2 for the same hamburger.

However, when you tell them what the money is going for, they can see an option. In this case, do I want a few extra dollars a month or do I want healthcare no matter what happens.

Just my thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im4edwards Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. they doze off before the taxes part comes around
or they figure, probably correctly, that they can get it and the cost get shifted off to "business" or something.

Or they're just nuts !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. People are willing to pay taxes
if they know they're going to get something for their money. If you ask anyone if they are willing to have their taxes raised, of course they'll say no because their experience has always been that paying higher taxes doesn't make their life easier, doesn't improve conditions in their city or state, doesn't make their school system any better, etc. In other words, they feel like they're not getting anything for their money because they don't see any changes for the better.

BUT if you ask if they'll pay higher taxes in exchange for Universal Health Care, you're giving them something tangible for their money. They know they'd be better off paying a little more in taxes than paying ridiculously high insurance premiums - or having no insurance at all.

We all want something for our money and when we give our money to the government, we have no idea where it goes or what it's used for. Sure, we're told it's for education, roads, etc. but does it ever seem like those things get any better? By telling us exactly what the money is used for, we know we're getting the better end of the deal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thats usually not how I have seen things happen
But I lived in a very conservative area.
Ask people to raise taxes, they will say no.
Ask people to raise their taxes by ten dollars, or raise the sales tax .5% to fund schools or fire departments, and the cheap assholes still say no.

People are greedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Please post
links to polls demonstrating this. I haven't seen any that specifically address the single payer health plan vs. tax increases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Clar, pick a different example if you like. That's what the 'e.g.' was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. People don't like absolutes
If you ask someone to give you ten bucks, they'll ask what for. If you won't tell them, they won't generally give it to you (Except maybe Hummer2 owners, who seem pretty gullible about money). If you say it's for something they want or approve, they'll support it.

People want to see results for their money. A lot of times the biggest problems with tax increases is that the side asking for the increase doesn't explain well what the benefits are. Ask someone to give a large chunk of their income to support the homeless, and they will respond only to the degree their charitable proclivities are motivated. Convince people that paying for clothing and food for the homeless will help create more jobs and stimulate the economy, then their self-interest gets involved, and you have more of a chance.

Here in Austin we just had an election to raise property taxes to support our community college system. When the campaign started, polls showed that there was no chance of passing such a tax increase in this political climate. But the CC board ran a campaign showing what all the tax dollars went to buy, and not just how they helped students, but how much the college helped the community, including the economy. The CC trained the majority of new nurses, of emergency service personnel, and even a large number of high-tech workers who stayed in the local economy. The tax increase passed by an easy margin. At the same time our city council was getting blasted for not spending their money more wisely.

You have to involve people's self interest, and their altruism, and you have to get them involved. If they feel good about something, and feel it will benefit them, they will be more likely to spend on it. It's when they feel their money is being taken without their consent and with no gain that they get upset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC