|
consider the following two scenarios, viewed through the eyes of a banana republican:
(1) a divorced father's teenage kid just passes the driving test. proud parent has been working overtime and give the kid a new car. they don't know much about cars and don't feel comfortable with a used car, so they buy a cheap new car. hard to find one for under, say, $15,000. so they that's what they get.
unfortunately for them, $10,000 is the limit anyone can gift to anyone else tax-free. the excess $5,000 is taxable income to the kid, or, assuming the kid is declared as a dependent on the mother's return, it is taxable income to the mother.
divorced mother can't swing the extra tax bill, and dad's tapped out, so they wind up having to sell the car at a big loss to pay the tax bill.
(yes, there are legal ways to avoid taxation here, but they require research, arcane knowledge, or, most likely, paying a tax professional, which may not be worthwhile.)
(2) a divorced father dies, and bequeaths to his only child (again, a teenager living with the ex-wife) stock, real estate, and art holdings, as well as several rare and exotic cars, all worth about $50,000,000. the assets have appreciated in value over 300% since purchased some of them many years ago, some of them quite recently.
tax-free, and you don't even have to see a tax professional about it. the stock appreciation will never be taxed, as the child's "cost basis" is the market value when transferred from the estate, not originally purchased.
in the banana republican world, this is completely fair and in fact, anything else is brutally unfair to the poor child in scenario two. somehow, banana republican convinced america that trust fund babies would have to sell family farms to pay estate taxes (they looked hard, but found exactly ZERO examples of this), but they don't give a rat's ass about scenario (1).
|