|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 03:17 AM Original message |
Outside of the fact that it is illegal, why have we not blown up Wal Mart? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 03:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. juridical persons are best taken out via lawsuits and/or legislation n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 03:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I know that. But I still want the company to go down completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 03:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. well, the company disappears with such, what more do you want? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 03:31 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Even if they won against the company, they still make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 03:34 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. not so; judgments can explicitly dissolve the company n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 04:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. would that not be a anti-trust issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 04:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. no, this is unrelated to antitrust |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 03:24 AM Response to Original message |
3. With all due respect... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 03:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thanks for the advice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 04:03 AM Response to Original message |
8. In addition to illegal it would be unethical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlowDownFast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-28-05 04:12 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yup. They will be their own undoing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC