Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has anyone gauged the DAMAGE that NameLeakGate could do?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:38 PM
Original message
Has anyone gauged the DAMAGE that NameLeakGate could do?
Two things keep occurring to me in the wake of this malicious, petty vicious attempt to damage people and make retaliation routine despite wrecking intelligence operations:

1.) who in their right mind would want to provide information to a CIA agent in the field if they had to worry that their CIA contact would be outed, putting anyone associated with the outed agent in danger?

2.) who the hell wants to go to work for the CIA knowing that their identity might be tossed up to the media if they fail to follow the administration line -- or even if a relative criticizes the administration? (whether an 'analyst' or an 'operative' is irrelevant....a CIA employee in the field incurs danger and would make a prize hostage to many hostile groups.

If it didn't come from the Bush administration, where the hell did it come from? Do the Freepers have any inkling how ruinous and wrong this is?

Of all the things Bush has done to piss me off since stealing the election, this one ranks near the top. He (or his minions) are willing to engage in personal destruction in order to stifle dissent over a war becoming ever more clearly a FRAUD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nobody in their RIGHT MIND
we are talking BUSH INCORPORATED here. I've said it over and over - they will stop at nothing - they will lie, steal, cheat, KILL to get their way. They are the lowest of the low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. You are correct.
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 03:55 PM by Brian Sweat
Even I did not see the scope of this. I only saw it in terms of the damage that it had done to Plame's network, but it will also make it difficult to establish new networks to replace the one that was burned. Especially after a few assets are removed from the books permamently. If you know what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. It pokes holes in the republican are better on foriegn policy
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 04:03 PM by Classical_Liberal
meme, and the republicans are more patriotic than traitorous dems meme, that Coulter attempted to start. So this is very damaging. It shows many of the war hawks to opportunistic rather than patriots, and it shows that they are amatures and unknowledgable on foriegn policy issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is a story I posted in LBN
CIA scandal could divert Rove from re-election campaign


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20031001/pl_afp/us_iraq_cia_rove_031001192025

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The controversy over accusations that the White House leaked the name of a CIA agent to get at a critic of the US war in Iraq could become a key distraction for President George W. Bush's main strategist Karl Rove.

Rove, the secretive mastermind of many Bush triumphs, has become the target of opposition Democrats in the row just as he puts the finishing touches to his campaign to secure Bush's re-election next year.

Even Joseph Wilson, the former ambassador whose wife was named in the leak as a Central Intelligence Agency operative, says he believes Rove and the White House had been "pushing" the story about his wife.

More....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. One nice little residual of this is -
Rove can no longer work in the dark. He's in the hot seat whether anyone admits it or not. He'll be PERCEIVED as damaged goods if this keeps up. And perception is, indeed, everything. He's powerful and intimidating because people believe him to be so. And he's not afraid to exploit that. So this has taken him down a few pegs. Maybe not a lot. At least not yet. But he's been hurt. His "aura of invincibility" has been compromised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Bush PNAC cabal have systematically politicized
the entire Executive Branch.

It's very Stalinesque.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. THe Bush/PNAC Cabal has systematically politicized
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 05:34 PM by leftofthedial
the entire Executive Branch.

Politicizing the economic council was troubling. Politicizing the CIA is horrifying for the reasons you list and more. There is the obvious danger to the individual operatives involved and to anyone our enemies might think were involved. The future danger for a political CIA to be unleashed on the USA is not compatible with the survival of democracy.

It's very Stalinesque.




NOTE: Sorry for the double post. When I hit post message, I got an error message, so I posted again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC