Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Local emergency teams resist plain-language radio rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 08:47 PM
Original message
Local emergency teams resist plain-language radio rules
Local emergency teams resist plain-language radio rules

By Joe Fiorill, Global Security Newswire
A month before the United States begins tying antiterrorism grants to recipients' observance of a new national emergency system, U.S. officials are cautioning state and local agencies against "continued resistance" to the system.

As of Oct. 1, prospective recipients of federal terrorism grants must show "good-faith efforts" to implement the National Incident Management System, Federal Emergency Management Agency spokesman Don Jacks said Thursday. Full compliance with the system is required after a year.

With the "good-faith" deadline approaching, the federal NIMS Integration Center has issued two cautionary bulletins in the past 10 days to response agencies around the country.

"The point is that all responders at all levels use the same organizational structures, terminology, procedures and systems all the time," the center said Aug. 17 in the first of the two bulletins. "The idea is to achieve interoperability among jurisdictions and disciplines."

http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=32106&dcn=todaysnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. they don't want to give up
the old "10-4" language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalArkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. 10-4
The problem is every jurisdiction has a different 10 code some meaning something entirely different. They are trying to move everyone to PROWORDS. A work means only one thing. It is what the military, MARS and FEMA have been using since WW2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hmmm, why don't they just have a standard...
The concept of the numerical system is to save time when calling in an emergency and when filling out the paperwork afterwards.

There should be one standard, then everyone is on the same page.
Personally, being an ex-firefighter, there is a logic to the numerical system. The plain language will cause huge problems. There is only one 10-4 but there several ways to say yes, positive, confirm, roger that, etc. and any one of those expressions can be confused with something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC