Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Randi smacking down freeper caller

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:38 PM
Original message
Randi smacking down freeper caller
Edited on Mon Aug-29-05 03:41 PM by The Witch
A caller saying "Well that's their job to be soldiers."

Randi is explaining that there is a contract signed where the armed forces have a duty not to make untrained folks do jobs they weren't trained for.

She says that if you don't have a hazmat license you can't drive a truck as a civilian; freeper doesn't understand why people don't have basic combat training: "When did that change?" "The minute we invaded Iraq and gave those non-combat jobs to contractors."

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jecks Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is.......
........an oversimplification.

Every soldier is first and foremost a soldier.

Every soldier is trained on a series of "common tasks", that is to say, tasks related to soldiers. For example Basic Rifle Marksmanship, First Aid, NBC training. This gives them the basics of being a foot soldier.

Every soldier then goes on to their Advanced Individual Training for their job.

No soldier is expected to do a job they have not been trained for.

If they are ordered to do something for which they have not been trained and they screw it up then the ordering individual is to blame by Army regs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And what Randi is saying
is that whether or not those are the regs, folks are being sent over for jobs they have not been trained for, because there's that shortage of bodies and because we don't have a plan and because the contractors are taking many of those non-combat jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Taking non-combat jobs was started in 2001. * had Haliburton
take over the feeding of the troops. (or Kellog Brown or one of those subsidies). That's why the food was so bad and the water non-existant during the first few months of the invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not an oversimplification at all
I have many family members and friends in the military. Take Solder One: he has his Basic training, then is assigned to be an automotive mechanic. Thats' pretty much all he does for the next five years: fix cars. Then suddenly you throw him into combat and expect him to be this great warriot... it won't happen. It CAN'T happen. Sure, they can be brave, but there "job" isn't being a soldier, not really, even if it technically is. They are support staff. That's what they were trained to do, and what they've done. I asked my BIL about this -- these men and women don't have combat refresher courses every other month. They are mechanics, or supply clerks, or cooks, or whatever.

They deserve better from the U.S. government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Every soldier signs up to defend their country
not to build someone else's democracy

All else is unimportant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Well, not quite.
Edited on Mon Aug-29-05 03:58 PM by TahitiNut
Army Regulations are quite clear. (I assume other services are too.) No person can be ordered into a combat zone under an MOS for which they're not fully trained and/or qualified. It's an illegal order. (Heard of those?) Period.

I designed and implemented the Enlisted Personnel Requisitioning System for USARV. Until it went into full effect, it was a common practice (and, when challenged, disallowed) to cut orders for enlisted personnel, filling billets for which they weren't trained. The most common cause of this was sheer sloth -- but malice played a role, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not another piece of info to educate another poor, deluded freeper!!!
I love it! "Give me your e-mail and I'll send it to you." LOL!

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityZen-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am willing ...
to bare and have Randi babies!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I suppose you'd have to bare before you bear anything :P
Sorry. Copy editor genes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityZen-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I barely understand your...
self image. The point is taken and forsaken. In a land where Inglish is a 2nd language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Sorry, dear.
Bare = to get naked
Bear = to carry, as children

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. All soldiers have "basic" combat training
but if that "basic" combat training was enough to prepare you to be an infantryman, the Infantry School at Fort Benning would be an anachronism.

Sending cooks and tank mechanics out on patrol is the reason we're getting back so many cooks and tank mechanics in flag-covered boxes. They don't know how to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not to mention
That folks join the military (I presume) with the understanding that they won't be used as pawns for a delusional madman's imperial designs. I'm not saying everyone in the military would object to being used as such, but our nation certainly doesn't expect the military to be a tool of empire, but our first line of defense against attack or invasion -- neither Iraq nor Afghanistan qualified as potential attackers or invaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Also, just because they signed up doesn't mean we should LIE to them.
If I signed up to protect my country, why should I be put in harms way based on bullshit? I wouldn't have signed up just for the president's kicks and whims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC