|
Yes, it is perfectly legitimate -- and legal -- to use other people's property in emergency situations where life or limb requires it. In a snow storm, you can take refuge in someone else's cabin. In a flood where potable water is scarce, you may take from a store's shelf to give safe drink to the thirsty. Or use your neighbor's johnboat to retrieve those who are stranded.
But there's a big difference between looting and trying to help people in an emergency situation.
When you're dealing with an emergency, you work with those around you. You try to handle emergency needs on a basis of health urgency. You don't take for your own material advantage, and you don't take what's not necessary for rescue and relief. You still act not to cause more damage to property than required; there's never excuse for vandalism. You're not ashamed to identify yourself. You don't run from the police who eventually arrive, but explain what you're doing and ask what more there is you can do to help.
It's not hard to distinguish those who are honestly helping from those who are taking advantage of the situation to loot. There's no excuse for the latter. Looters hurt relief efforts. First, they are a threat both to those who are trying to help, and those who need help. The step from vandalism and burglary to assault is not a big one. Second, they distract responders from rescue and relief efforts. Third, they may abscond with or destroy items that would have been useful to people who are really trying to help.
Don't defend looters.
|