|
In all the threads about looting yesterday, I heard a large faction of DU'ers accepting and apologizing for their behavior. The general consensus I found was that looting food for you and your family is OK, but looting a TV is not.
Here is a paraphrased cross section of responses I saw:
They were just trying to survive.
There was no help available to them.
Who cares about a few TVs? What should they just DIE?
Paging inspector javert....
These people just lost everything they had. They deserve whatever they can get.
Anyone that condemns the looters is a corporatist tool.
Yes, some people were looting for items they desperately needed. Maybe the majority of people looting a grocery store are taking just what they need and not a single thing more - but I doubt it. The people that actually break the glass and are the first in the store are usually profiteers. People with a criminal mind looking for the things of the most value, that they think they can sell once they get back to their street. Oh and beer too. Must have beer during an emergency.
Not everyone in a neighborhood is going to loot and the ones that do are wrong, and maybe if you read to the end of this you will see why.
Here is an account of the looting I saw on tonight's (Tuesday) news in rough order of severity:
A woman with a half gallon of juice in each hand.
Various people with anything from just a grocery bag to a shopping cart or trash barrel full of food. One guy had a shopping cart with nothing but drinks.
Police scuffling with a looter in front of a downtown electronics store. People running wild on the street with arm-loads of clothes.
A Walmart being totally emptied, a person with a whole cart full of shoes. Even two cops wandering around with a shopping cart like they were shopping on a Sunday afternoon - and yes, there were some items in their cart.
Sorry to the looter apologists, but it is ALL wrong and here is why: As a people, we should be coming together in a time of disaster. Yes, these people may have been cut off from all information of the outside world, they didn't have the red cross or national guard immediately available to them, but how much brain power does it take to realize that they could not hold out forever, they need to find the help they need, or at least gather together to make it easier for help to find them - and to help each other.
That grocery store held enough food for a large amount of people for a couple of days. Instead of the guy with a cartload of drinks going back to his neighborhood to sell them for whatever amount he could, or trading them for whatever he wanted, shouldn't that resource be saved for all?
This grocery store was not flooded at this time. They showed people leaving and going back into floodwaters with full grocery carts.
What if instead of everyone fending for themselves, those that shloshed through waist deep water to loot what they could carry, they found the following scenario:
The grocery store was being guarded by volunteers. Fact is once you got there you were a volunteer. When you arrived, you were told that this store was being set up as an emergency staging area, and that you would be fed and given shelter. You were asked to go home and bring your family back to this area, and tell everyone you meet on the way to join you. The name of your party was taken and an approximate number of people you were coming back with was noted. If you needed assistance moving an injured person from where you came from, volunteers were dispatched to go with you with some sort of makeshift stretcher.
The stores next door were being cleared out to make space for people. Drinks and snacks were being delivered from the grocery store for people to eat. Diapers, formula and baby food were available instead of being one of the first things missing from the store due to individual profiteering.
A bathroom area (most likely 5 gallon buckets) and TOILET PAPER. The buckets were being periodically dumped by volunteers.
Special needs for items like over the counter medications were being addressed and brought to you - the best they can.
Minor medical treatment was being given by whatever skilled personnel were on hand. Injured people and their families were being kept together so that their needs could be met as soon as help arrived.
The roof of the grocery store was accessed and people stationed on the roof to watch for helicopters. Other nearby buildings were being investigated for use as shelter as more people arrived - and higher roofs being scoped out.
Volunteers were breaking into other stores in the neighborhood to find needed supplies such as batteries and flashlights.
More volunteers were finding metal barrels and breaking up burnable debris. A large area lit with fires in metal barrels for light was being set up in a parking lot. This will serve as a gathering place for those that weren't sleeping in the make-shift shelter(s). An outdoor wood fired cooking area was being set up for soup (yes there are plenty of pots and pans in the back of most grocery stores - and disposable cups can be used as bowls. You would want people to hang on to whatever containers/plastic silverware they were issued, and that they should be cleaned out with paper towels.
Would this scenario not be preferable to what was occurring? And to those that say there was no help yesterday - the number I had heard was that by Tuesday night 40,000 had already been taken to shelters by the national guard. When help arrives, would it not be easier if they knew how many were injured and where they were? If people gathered together instead of their houses, would they not be easier to rescue? Would diapers be available to everyone that needs one, if given out one at a time instead of the first few people grabbing packs of them and then a profiteer grabbing the last 20 packs and rolling out with a cart? What if every grocery store - a valuable resource in any disaster was being managed by the people, for the people?
If that Walmart I saw being looted was managed like I described above, it could have met the needs of several hundred people for over a week. Supplies and people could be moved to the roof as necessary. In the mean time, the parking lot would have made a good area for people to gather under firelight, and the other strip stores in your typical Walmart complex cleared out for sleeping space/burnable materials.
I know, I know, it's way too much to ask of our society to act like civilized adults in absence of authority. Guys with AK47's are shooting up a police station as I write this. It's too much for people to follow anything more than their desire for their next meal, or for others to step to the plate and lead when the need arises.
Perhaps we need to revisit our civil defense system, and re-purpose it so that multiple people on every block were trained in some rudimentary way on what to do in a disaster. Plans made on a neighborhood by neighborhood basis to take care of the needs of ALL the people in a disaster.
I guess my problem is that I expect too much from my fellow Americans. Without a badge or a hat to listen to, we degenerate into savages that only care about what they can get for themselves. We are a nation of greedy bastards. I don't judge the people who were stealing food to survive, but if we were a more civilized nation, this disaster could have been handled so much better.
|