|
I agree that the Plame game and the WMD lies are marginally connected. But please note that the Plame naming has succeeded in knocking the "missing" WMD story out of the headlines. The press is chasing a sidebar while the story that got 20,000 Iraqis and 300 Americans dead is going unreported.
The real stories are (1) the cost of the war, occupation, and reconstruction is bankrupting the federal government, which in turn is passing off the income shortfall to the state level, and (2) the lies and half-truths used to justify this war, which was in fact a big distraction from the faltering war against terrorists.
Blowing Plame's cover is a sidebar, but it's all the press cares about right now. That's my gripe. As to your points:
1. Bush used the CIA, but they are hardly "undermined." They seem to be fighting back OK. Protecting Plame is their agenda, but we're still missing the big story.
2. I don't know where you got the specific number of "up to 70 undercover agents." The lives that are in danger are their non-American contacts in the field. What is your source for "70"?
3. The mission of uncovering WMDs has been compromised. Very true, but this is a national security risk, not an attack on democracy itself. I'm arguing the latter is worse.
4 & 5. It is a high crime (impeachable offense) to name an agent. The conflicts of interest are enough to force resignations. Agreed. But that is not the same as attacking our form of government
6. (they had 2 months and 11 hours to shred evidence and coordinate alibis). The cover up is always worse than the crime.
7. undermines democracy by trying to silent critics and people who have info available to them which can debunk WH lies.
I think you're missing my main point about proportionality of the harms they've done. Committing crimes to intimidate critics is serious. I don't dispute that. It's ugly and it backfired on them. But the standard being used, the whole hyperbole of being "worse than Watergate," is not being met.
Watergate was, at its heart, an attack on the institutions of democracy. What's more, it was a successful attack. The Democrats nominated their weakest candidate and the Republicans effectively stole the '72 election.
The Republicans are up to stuff that meets the Watergate standard--the Florida voter rolls scandal is one example I've cited. The Plame outing is a bigger spectacle right now and may lead to our side winning more points in the long run. But it's far from being the biggest, worst, or most destructive thing this administration is doing.
If we only focus on this, we're going to lose the game.
|