Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Rebuild" NOLA? Not much easier than rebuilding Atlantis.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 12:33 AM
Original message
"Rebuild" NOLA? Not much easier than rebuilding Atlantis.
Anyone who would propose anything like a 'restoration' is just plain nuts. A small section (the Vieux Carre, obviously and a few other small parcels) might be reclaimable for historical and tourist purposes at some marginally bearable expense which would of course involve new and much more permanent levees, but any attempt to recreate a city of anything like 1M population is nothing but an insane rat dream. And that's all I have to say about that.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. My thought was...
Where do they pump out the water...TO?

At this point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, all the water has to eventually end up at sea level just like
every other place on the planet. Unfortunately in this case that is UP which automatically makes it ultimately an exercise in futility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. And first...they'd have to rebuild levees that are underwater.
Edited on Thu Sep-01-05 01:15 AM by alphafemale
And bring in new pumps to pump this (polluted) water...where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, there was San Fransisco, 1906.
Seems to me it can and should be done. In fact, this could be an opportunity to to prove to ourselves and the world that we can rebound from disasters. Wouldn't giving up and admitting defeat be more damaging to the national psyche? Recreating a better New Orleans would also be a stimulus to this economy....people are going to need jobs, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. San Fransisco isn't built on quicksand below sea level.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. There's going to be lots of fill available now, though....
That's another thing....what to do with all the debris?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. I disagree....
If the levees were properly maintained (e.g., the Netherlands) this would have been a lesser tragedy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. True - do they get hurricanes in Netherlands or Venice?
Just curious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. This ain't the Netherlands. Obviously. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. "It's happened before and it'll happen again"....
That's what some guys from New Orleans told me tonight at a bar in Baton Rouge. Of course they're not quite right--what hasn't happened before is the massive death toll on this scale. But that could have been prevented with a more aggressive evacuation and better levees. The rebuilding won't be such a challenge--most of the buildings and houses are still standing. And a good part of what tourists know as New Orleans (a lot more than a few "small parcels") is dry or under just a foot or two of water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. And your engineering degree tells you that?
I'm sorry, that wasn't nice of me, but I think you haven't a scintilla of idea what you are talking about. "...won't be such a challenge..."???????

Pardon me while I go outside and get rid of what's left of my late night supper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. "rebuilding" will be the problem for the Mississippi coast...
Edited on Thu Sep-01-05 01:46 AM by blitzen
that's where houses got smashed to smithereens. Come to New Orleans next year and take a look--it will be pretty much the same as it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. Well, if it's "comable" in a year, I will and I'll buy you as many Hurri-
canes at Pat O'Briens as you can drink for one solid month! But if it's still a dead city, what's your offer on the wager?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. I 'd rather not drink for a solid month...
Well, I'd like to, but I probably shouldn't. So I'll wager a dinner at the best restaurant in Baton Rouge against one night's drinks at Pat O'Briens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. LOL...okay you are on!
(I am serious) krs@ispwest.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. we have ourselves a bet!
I'll e-mail you to make it official.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Well, for the record, it's a bet I wouldn't mind losing.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. You aren't really disagreeing, you are proposing a retroactive "what if"
The "construction" of New Orleans wasn't a "project", it was a hundred year farrago of improvisations, afterthoughts, band-aids, plastic surgery and a huge (sorry, hugh) slice of luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's not just the futility of building on quicksand below sea level ...
... it's the mindless screw-up of constantly channelling the Mississippi and allowing some of the most ecologically valuable delta wetlands erode away. That's killing off the sealife (we eat) and shrinking the habitat for too many critters to count. That area is a slow-motion ecological disaster -- paved over with greed and hubris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Yes, I assuredly should have mentioned that also, sir. Thank you.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Woo Hoo...Let's just write it off?
Let's say, we might ever get a moon colony. And it fails, shoud we just abandon it? Or should we make it better?

Let's say the Space Shuttle blows up a few times in trying to figure out how to get men into space? Should we abandon that too?

Let's say, I'm sailing across the ocean on a very larger liner. I'm very confidant I'll make New York. It's a wonderful ship, called the Titanic, and she hits an iceberg. Some 1500 people die. Should we stop sailing large liners across the Atlantic? Or should we fix them?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. There is nothing in NO that is a basis for construction
There are NO useful sewer lines. There are NO useful electricity lines. There are NO useful water lines. There are NO useful roads, and those that are intact will have to be torn up to lay new pipes, wires, etc. Same for rail and transit. And the worst part is this: every building you see from the smallest cottage to the Superdome is unsound structurally. 99% of every building would have to be razed and rebuilt.

The city may not look it, but it is 100% obliterated. It may as well not be there at all. Do you have the hundreds of billions, probably trillions of dollars to build a city of two million people from scratch? Is it wise to spend an amount equalling as much as 1/3 of the entire expenditures of the nation rebuilding a city on a wetland near a rising sea prone to more hurricanes?

If you think it should be rebuilt, do it with your own money and kill your own people when it fails (again). I want no part in this folley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. What the HELL is your problem DinoBoy???
:eyes: ... plant roses, not skunk-weed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. I like the way they rebuilt Atlantis
Nice slot machines they got there :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. that is what will probably happen
the lower elevations of the city will be abandoned while the higher ground will be rebuilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Lets just abandon the midwest while we are at it.
What with tornado alley and the like, oh and the midwest sits on a mega fault line as well.


Lots of town have low-lying areas that could be divested in a freak deal like this, including the town I live in. Try to focus on the funding cuts to Army Corp, and the decimation of the marsh areas due to recent development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. I have no idea what you are talking about. Your town is...20,000?
Sure, the MS river could flood it and probably has but that's not anything even approaching what's going on down in NOLA. You're a LONG way above Sea Level...and anyway you're complaining about the marsh areas which ALL of NO is built on in the first place! You are arguing against YOURSELF here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. And Chicago is like what 4 million?
The Chicago river flows backward for a reason. They operate under the same principle as NOLA, constantly pumping to stay dry. Remember the floods of a few years ago?

A big river hub like NOLA will be rebuilt quicker than a smaler place like this river town. You are the one carping on the fact that parts of NOLA are below sealevel. Clinton is indeed a very long way above sealevel, and yet 40 years ago it was 3/4 under water.


I guess I was unaware that the only wetlands in LA were under NO. :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Well, I admit you have a couple of points which is probably a good time
for me to expand my comments...I think there is far too little risk assessment considered for MANY locales, NOT just New Orleans, and many of them lie along the river near which you live. And which I lived for a number of years a few hundred miles south of you...I think it is idiotic to continue to rebuild in flood plains just as it is stupid to put a city below sea level. Yes, a tornado can wipe out a town or even a large chunk of a city (I live in the smack dab middle of tornado alley) but here is the difference:

It is IMPOSSIBLE to do anything that I'm aware of to -eliminate- the possibility that a tornado will hit any given location..........BUT it
damn sure IS possibile to eliminate the chance that the Gulf of Mexico will drain down into your city if you just make sure the goddamn thing is ABOVE sea level.

I have similar opinions concerning construction on top of the San Andreas fault (and to a lesser degree, the New Madrid 1500 miles east of there)...and I suppose you can extrapolate them as applicable...?

I'm not trying to start any fights here, just giving my professional opinion under the assumption that is still allowed. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. don't forget that NO is a huge port city...
so a "cost vs. benefits" analysis would weigh heavily in favor of pumping tons of money into keeping it going. And that's surely why it has continued to exist despite its otherwise unfavorable situation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. I bet this place really got your cork-a-poppin, no?
Edited on Thu Sep-01-05 02:30 AM by LincolnMcGrath
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. Know it well. :D
Edited on Thu Sep-01-05 02:51 AM by karlrschneider
:D
edit: Just making sure you don't think I believe that's KNEW...I do get to Japan now and then

heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senaca Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
44. In the spirit of Chicago ingenuity, why not rebuild NO with newest tech.
This may sound strange, but why not have a new type of Enviro World's Fair to start the rebuilding of NO? This would have to take into consideration the historical integrity of NO buildings and flavor, but why not invite the world's top leaders in environmental construction or technology to show what we may see in the future for renewable energy, etc. To show that at least part of a city can be built in a more environmental energy self sustaining way, given the unique challenges that NO has, would help in proving that with willpower it can be done anywhere. Even with a catastrophe of this level, power might still be generated in some other manner than gas/electric. This may sound naive given the administration we have, but then again I'm hoping it could generate brainstorming and better ideas in helping NO rebuild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. Stop it. It'll come back.. Mark my words.
(No not for awhile, but these people are pretty resilient. NO will be back!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Well, the problem for your interesting little scenario is that none
of them will even BE there for a very long time. Nor will they really have anything to "go back to."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. The overwhelming majority of the damage is water damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. I'll bet you Mardi Gras happens in the spring!
These people are going to put their town back together!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Damn straight! ... and YOU are invited!... as well as those on this thead
who have already written us off. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. Yes, it is. And flood water damage after a few days is essentially fatal
to most structures. But you failed to address the point that the city is being emptied of what makes a city a city, the populace. Do you really think they all would want to return to a geographical location where they USED to have a domicile that has ceased to exist? That is absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Do you watch the tv at all?
What about the internets?


How many structures are missing? I saw interviews all day of folks who defied the orders and were returning to survey damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. 2 words - "black mold" in humid hot environment..+ toxic sludge -
I would be quite surprised if they every rebuilt New Orleans right where it is. they ain't totally evacuating for the fun of it.

Or maybe the developers will take all the land ala the Supreme Court and build on the toxic sludge...that sounds about right for bushco - but regular people? I doubt will ever be able to build and live there again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. That's funny, because that's what people in NO live with all the time
anyway.

If the Corps gets the dykes fixed, they'll be back with a passion.

Gar-un-teeeed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
25. My first reaction was to call you lots of bad names but...
In the spirit of Cindy Sheehan's altruism, when we rebuild my beautiful city, including the majestic areas outside of the French Quarter, we will welcome you warmly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. I am sorry that I offended you, Swamp Rat, I meant NO insult! I LOVE
Edited on Thu Sep-01-05 02:01 AM by karlrschneider
New Orleans and have for over 40 years. I have been there at least 25 times and I think it has been one of the most amazingly cosmopolitan cities that was ever my pleasure to visit (and I have been to exactly 52 countries)...but sadly I am forced to face a reality which I can only liken to that when one of my dearly loved pets has reached the end of its life and must be allowed to die in dignity. I say this with only the utmost sadness. ;(

edit: couple silly typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. OK
:hug:

I disagree because I intend to rebuild, with whomever is willing to help. It may get hit again with a hurricane and flood again... and I will help, yet again, to rebuild. New Orleans is, in my opinion, the Soul of America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
43. FWIW: I heard from an Army Corps of Engineers guy...
That AFTER they repair all the levies, it will take six months, 24/7, to pump out the water. But that's only if it doesn't rain for the next six months.

His remark was off the record, but his back of the envelope calculations backed up his estimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. It could very well take 6 months to repair the (now THREE) broken levees
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC