Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Times Picayune: Catastrophe could have been avoided...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 01:58 AM
Original message
Times Picayune: Catastrophe could have been avoided...
Edited on Thu Sep-01-05 02:02 AM by MnFats
Newhouse News Service, in an article posted late Tuesday night at The Times-Picayune Web site, reported: "No one can say they didn't see it coming. ... Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious questions are being asked about the lack of preparation."

In early 2004, as the cost of the conflict in Iraq soared, President Bush proposed spending less than 20 percent of what the Corps said was needed for Lake Pontchartrain, according to a Feb. 16, 2004, article, in New Orleans CityBusiness.

On June 8, 2004, Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana; told the Times-Picayune: "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us."

Also that June, with the 2004 hurricane season starting, the Corps' project manager Al Naomi went before a local agency, the East Jefferson Levee Authority, and essentially begged for $2 million for urgent work that Washington was now unable to pay for. From the June 18, 2004 Times-Picayune:

"The system is in great shape, but the levees are sinking. Everything is sinking, and if we don't get the money fast enough to raise them, then we can't stay ahead of the settlement," he said. "The problem that we have isn't that the levee is low, but that the federal funds have dried up so that we can't raise them."



http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001051313
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. That story is like reading the warnings for 9/11--people pleaded
and urged and once again, they did nothing until disaster struck.

This story needs to be sent to every media outlet in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluesplayer Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. this is so much worse that 9/11
in that there is a huge history of studies to determine what was needed to protect the city, projects begun but not finished, and Bush diverting the necessary funds to Iraq and his "base."

We can only hope that the emergency bureaucracy in this country will be able to use their expertise to do what is necessary in spite of the administration's complete fuck-up of everything it has touched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Damn, someone said "no proof Bush is responsible", this is PROOF!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. bzzzzt! wrong-o
He was "misled" by "faulty intelligence". It's NEVER his fault... he hasn't claimed responsibility for ANYTHING..ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. people don't seem to wonder where all the money for the wars come from
Edited on Thu Sep-01-05 02:09 AM by Skittles
guess what, folks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think this is a dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. i think you may be right but even so I thought it worth reposting...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. This and a similar story in WaPo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC