|
Edited on Thu Sep-01-05 06:14 AM by fujiyama
that Clinton won Louisiana both times.
But he didn't win either Mississippi or Alabama either time.
La has a democratic governor and until recently both its senators were democrats. It's frustrating that they won that senate seat. The repuke candidate was truly awful.
I think the first thing to focus on is the obvious recovery effort which itself will take years, but it certainly has to be made clear by democratic politicians that you get what you pay for - meaning these are the reasons government collects taxes - partly it's for emergencies. I know in Al atleast, many of the residents are extremely anti tax. They have to know that with less taxes collected, you will get a shitty infrastructure. They can't have their cake and eat it too. You can't pay for a war, cut taxes, and maintain an infrastructure, especially in disaster prone areas. But in this case, it has to actually be made a federal issue. Democrats have to hammer it home nationally that Bush's cuts in FEMA and his unwillingness to listen to the Army Corp's proposals shows an incredible negligence on his part - and the entire republican party - of the infrastructure in this country.
|