An
analysis by James Glassman at Tech Central Station claims there were many more severe hurricanes in both the 1940's and 1950's than there have been so far in the 2000's.
He manages this by looking at data for the 2000 hurricane season alone (there were three severe hurricanes) and compares it to the 40's and 50's as if that one year alone constituted an entire decade, 2000-2010:
Giant hurricanes are rare, but they are not new. And they are not increasing. To the contrary. Just go to the website of the National Hurricane Center and check out a table that lists hurricanes by category and decade. The peak for major hurricanes (categories 3,4,5) came in the decades of the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s, when such storms averaged 9 per decade. In the 1960s, there were 6 such storms; in the 1970s, 4; in the 1980s, 5; in the 1990s, 5; and for 2001-04, there were 3.
Actually, there have been
21 category 3, 4 or 5 hurricanes so far this decade:
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/ - the data Glassman uses comes from
a report that has this as it's first sentence, which he didn't read or understand:
This version of the Deadliest, Costliest, and Most Intense United States Hurricanes from 1900 to 2000 extends the work of Hebert et al. (1997) through the 2000 season.
Assrocket at Powerline
concurs with Glassmaqn's ridiculously flawed analysis,
Of course, facts have never stood in the Left's way. But there is something especially repellent about efforts by left-wingers like Robert Kennedy Jr. to make political hay out of the current natural disaster.
More details ...
http://fearofclowns.com/2005/09/idiot-right-wingers-so-wildly-off-mark.html