"The women were leftie sluts, they deserved it,"

[Must_B_Free]

See, according to the Freepers, if you are a leftie, you deserve to get groped by Arnold. And you don't deserve for it to count. Gee - what does he get to go to women who actually dare to vote? Pus their face in the commode?

"To: republicanwizard

Let me guess, it was on a rowdy movie set, it doesn't count. The women were leftie sluts, they deserved it, he's such a wonderful guy to admit it, show he has great character, it was in the past.


4 posted on 10/02/2003 9:58 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
"

[acmavm]

1. Obviously the lobotomy took.

n/t

[Brucey]

2. What gets me is that all they think this requires is an apology!

Isn't groping people a bit more than an accident or breech of etiquette?

[NNN0LHI]

7. These guys idea of foreplay would be saying "git in the truck bitch" n/t

[Bandit]

12. I thought it was "Hump or Dump"

What "Morans"

[noiretextatique]

15. it definitely is MORE than a breech of etiquette

it's a pattern that's indicative of his over-blown sense of privilege. i hope the nexxt woman drop-kicks his ass.

[Patriot_Spear]

3. Like I said- send this to the Fresno City Atty-

They need stuff like this to help make the just label of 'Hate Group' stick to FreaKKK RepubliKKK. Do your part- future litigators will need this ammo to bring them down for good.

[ShimokitaJer]

4. Not to defend the Freepers, but...

I think that particular post was obviously being sarcastic about the lengths to which Arnold supporters would go in order to dismiss the damning evidence. That's why they started with the snide "let me guess" comment.

I actually assumed it was a DU mole calling the idiots on their shit.

[w4rma]

8. Freepers do truely act like DUers being sarcastic.

That's why, on DU, one should always note that you're being sarcastic. It is very hard to tell sometimes.

Don't automatically assume that the Freeper is being sarcastic. Most likely that Freeper is exactly serious.

Note, the "Let me guess," part makes me wonder if the Freeper is sarcastic also.

[Melinda]

16. I completely disagree with your assessment.

I think it's the original assumption that's in error. The post at freeperville is obvious sarcasm which, as we all know, requires that one possess a certain amount of "wit" - and in this case "wit" + "freeper" = one hell of an oxymoron.

And then there is context in regard the original "assumption", but I digress.

Yes, that post was much more likely the result of an infiltration OR it came from the actual conservative side of that site.

[Melinda]

9. Yep - it positively drips sarcasm = obviously NOT a freeper post

To accuse the person who posted that of being a "freeper" is intellectually dishonest at best.

DUers can do better.

[tom_paine]

Jesus Christ these people are fucking monsters

Be ready. During the reign of Emperor Jeb, they will be coming for us...and everyone who disagree with the Emperor/Fuehrer..

[skypilot]

5. This "freeper" post...

...actually sounds more like a lefty infiltrator to me. I sense a lot of sarcasm in the post.

[curlyred]

10. Sarcasm is right

I read the whole thread over there, and it was definitelya sarcastic remark.

I take great delight in making fun of freepers and their stupid remarks, but this wasn't one. There are plenty of other serious remarks over there that are fair game if you can get through without a DNS error.

[markses]

13. Or the McClintock faction

The post is clearly sarcastic, attacking the Arnold apologists.

However, if you read the whole thread, you should note deep divisions within FR about the Schwartzenegger candidacy - one post accuses the moderators of moving the thread from "Breaking news" because of support for Arnold.

A little reading nuance is useful here. This particular poster is anti-Arnold, but may not be a leftist infiltrator for all that. McClintock still gets 15% in the polls. I think the FR set is the majority of that 15%.

[prolesunited]

6. And I'm sure if he took it even farther

and raped them, I'm sure they deserved it as well. :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:

If these neanderthals have girlfriends or wives, what do you think the chances are that they beat them?!?! I'm sure it would be justified because they made them do it.

[realFedUp]

11. these people are spawned....

they can't possibly have mothers, sisters, daughters...

[markses]

14. The comment was sarcastic, and an attack on the pro-Arnold faction

You are reading it incorrectly.

[FlemingsGhost]

17. The behavioral pattern is what's most disturbing...

This is consistent behavior over the span of three decades. An established pattern that suggests a genuine sensitivity problem.

In its most basic concept, Arnold's history of inappropriate contact is no different from any habitual sex offender.