When will the Kerry attacks begin???

[Mr_King]

We already have the Clinton attacks...will the Kerry and Dean attacks soon follow???

[Cooley Hurd]

1. Tell me that Dean/Kerry have excused Bush's response to Katrina...

...and I'll attack them with the ferocity that I'm attacking Big Dog. :eyes:

[Arkana]

17. Dean hasn't--he issued a statement telling Bush that it was time

to "step up," and I got a letter from Kerry about Katrina's victims.

[Walt Starr]

2. Clinton deserves everything he gets today

He kissed Bush's ass for one reason and one reason only, the political aspirations of Hillary.

Hillary Clinton lost the 2008 election today. There is no way in hell she will be elected.

[Ravenseye]

8. I'm slow today

Help me out Walt. She lost the 2008 election because Bubba kissed the Chimp's ass?

I'm confused.

[SaveElmer]

10. That is complete Horseshit!!!

Had Clinton refused a request from the President to help out he would have been crucified. Fact is he did a great job with the Tsunami relief. And there is every reason to believe he will do the same here. No matter what he may have thought about Bush's performance in private, he had no choice but to help!!!

[Karmadillo]

14. Helping is one thing. Claiming no one could have expected the

disaster is another one. If he can't speak the truth, he shouldn't be saying anything.

[K-W]

15. Nobody is critisizing his helping,

Clinton is being critisized because he is playing along with Bush's story that this event could not have been predicted.

Of course he should help. That doesnt mean he has to run his mouth off and cover for Bush.

[Mr_King]

22. That's right

Clinton is already seen as the devil by the press. If he slammed Bush he would be painted as a villian by the media and in the process make the entire Democratic party look heartless.

I must admit this isn't really a time to look partisan.

They're will be plenty of time for that in the coming monthes during the clean up.

[K-W]

26. I think politically neutral comments wouldnt have bothered anyone.

It was his pro-Bush comments that earned him scorn from DU.

[AX10]

34. That I agree with you on Walt. No to Hillary in 08'!

She'll just continue the elitist dynasty that has ruined our nation.

Clark or Dean in 2008!

[Don Claybrook]

3. how about right now?

what's kerry's response? I haven't heard anything from him? What is he doing? If he says something like Bill Clinton just said, then he's just as fucking worthless as Bill Clinton.

Is that about what you wanted to hear?

[1956]

7. Under 2004 elec. results

the scuttlebutt is that he is definitely not giving up the legal battle and might meet with Conyers about "The Fraud".

[Hobarticus]

4. Oh yes...must destroy Bill for betraying us.

Heaven forbid Big Dawg actually tries to rise above politics to help.

Sometimes this place slays me.

[RBHam]

6. Rising above politics? Covering for the Bush Admin's criminal ineptitude?

Clinton is nothing but a political animal.

[Ravenseye]

11. Could it possibly be...

..that he actually cares about the people in suffering down there? That he loves his country and every citizen? That he's doing this to do what he can to help?

[Name removed]

19. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[gauguin57]

21. That's not what we're talking about. We're talking about the interview

in which Clinton basically covered for Bush's incompetence -- saying what can be done has been done by the federal government.

We're not talking about his fundraising, only his shilling for the incompetent Bush Admin.

[Don Claybrook]

31. This is not helpful

If he wants to help, he can publicly excoriate this administration for the mass murder they've committed. It might actually shame them into doing something.

[Hobarticus]

18. You're right. Bill should use the opportunity to assign blame

instead of calling for help.

Yep, that's the plan.

[K-W]

27. Clinton could have stayed neutral.

Your post seems to imply that he only had 2 choices, backup Bush or bash Bush.

He could have done niether.

[JanusAscending]

39. Clinton

I absolutely admire Bill Clinton, but I must admit, after hearing him on CNN a few minutes ago, siding with Bush 1, who was making excuses for his baby boy, and Clinton agreeing and going along with him, I LOST A LOT OF RESPECT FOR HIM!! I never thought I could say that, 'cause I even forgave him for his idiotic escapade while in office!! As for John Kerry, he has already responded to this disaster. Those of us who support him, have heard from him personally, and he and Teresa had news article released a day or so ago. I don't have the thread at hand, but maybe someone else can post it to you!! I am certain, that if JK were our president right now. we wouldn't even be in this predicament!!

[RBHam]

5. Watch Jack Cafferty???

When will John Kerry speak up for the poor, the indigent, the people of color left to rot in New Orleans???

Does he give a damn?

[Mr_King]

9. I think...

Somebody needs to remind him Kerry isn't in the Oval Office.

[RBHam]

16. But he is the de facto leader of the opposition!

It's his JOB to point out BushCo's criminal negligence.

[Mr_King]

33. It is his JOB...

to be the Senator from Massachusetts.

Kerry knows like most of the country that Bush & Co. are negligent. Why preach to the chior?

I just wish people's eyes down their would have openned up about Bush this time last year and then maybe Kerry wouldn't be the Senator from Massachusetts right now.

[Clark2008]

12. So far, Wes Clark is the only one I see speaking out

for them.

And, of course, Landrieu - but she kind of HAS to, you know?

[Hobarticus]

23. True...but Clark hasn't been tapped to mobilize aid, either

That gives him a lot more room to criticize than Clinton has.

BTW, loved Clark's statement.

[Clark2008]

28. Maybe they should tap him to do it.

I guarantee it would be done yesterday and with more efficiency than anything Shrub has ever done.

[Hobarticus]

41. No argument there...take a gander at SE Europe...

Clark unfucked that place in a hurry.

Clark's day is yet to come.

[high density]

13. DU is amazingly reactionary

Turn on Pres. Clinton and praise Jack Cafferty? Come on, this is nuts.

[K-W]

25. So now it is reactionary to not blindly support Democrats? EOM

[goforit]

20. Kerry???.....That guy who pretends to be anti-Bush???

[bluetuesday]

24. Kerry?

I'm sorry,where is he??

[never_get_over_it]

35. Oh come on he sent out an email

and you know he was probably on vacation - what more do you want.

We have to stop enabling these DLC fake Democrats to assist the repunks in destroying this country. Yes Bill should help but no he should not provide cover for the feak in chief. And Clinton's chummy relationship with this criminal family makes me physically ill.

[Mr_King]

37. Let's see who else can we attack...

Gore, Carter, Kennedy, Edwards, Jesse Jackson, Feinstein, Obama, Bayh, Richardson, Hillary, Warner, Sharpton, Pelosi, Cuomo, Boxer, Dukakis, Mondale, Reid, McGovern, Levin.....

[K-W]

40. If they do something wrong they should be attacked. EOM

[KitchenWitch]

29. I think the Clark attacks are not far behind as well.

[K-W]

32. Why, is Clark planning to backup Bush's excuses?

The straw man construction in this thread is astounding.

[Clark2008]

36. Clark's already busted Bushie's chops on this

But, yeah, can't have his name mentioned in a thread without some misinformed soul spewing about Haitian man-titties or some such nonsense.

[K-W]

38. Hmm

I dont understand the body of your post, but my point was that unless Clark plans to make excuses for Bush(which I assume he wont do) he has no fear of being critisized the way Clinton has for making excuses.

[TeeYiYi]

30. My freeper BIL lashed out at Kerry . . .

. . . after I sent this email:

"No One Can Say they Didn't See it Coming"

August 31, 2005 By Sidney Blumenthal

In 2001, FEMA warned that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of
the three most likely disasters in the U.S. But the Bush administration cut New Orleans flood control funding by 44 percent to pay for the Iraq war. (I included the article in its entirety.) http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,372455,00.html


His response: Wow, it only took 3 days to blame everything on Bush. I'm sure Kerry would have been spending tons of money protecting New Orleans as soon as he took office - actually, that was one of his campaign promises...wasn't it? yyeah, yeah, that's it - it was.


My reply: Did you even read the first article I sent? The Bush administration crippled FEMA funding for natural disasters. Read this article from 2004. Louisiana, who's waterways drain two thirds of the continental United States, was denied requests for flood mitigation funds over a year ago.: http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2004-09-28/cover_story.html . . .


His reply: That's exactly what New Orleans is and needs to stay - a drainage pond. No amount of preparation could have saved that area from that kind of storm. Does no good to politicize the issue; it would have happened no matter what. They will probably rebuild it and it will happen again some day.


TYY:banghead:

[pinto]

42. Locked.

And this will further discussion...how?
Locking as flamebait.

Thanks for your understanding.