Oprah "should" donate, churches "should" open their doors...

[wtmusic]

It's one thing to demand our government take care of its people. But before anyone pronounces what another citizen's or group's contribution "should" be, it might be a good idea to ask ourselves what our own contribution should be, and better yet--why not more.

That's all.

[KingFlorez]

1. Oprah has pledged some cash

[linazelle]

2. That's great, but it's as if you (and I) have to defend a woman

who is nothing if not caring and giving. The question of who gives should be asked by people looking at themselves in the mirror.

[Tyranny_R_US]

3. Yeah what wtmusic said!

[wtmusic]

4. hahaha

:thumbsup:

[mondo joe]

5. The idea that ANY private citizen is more obliged to respond to this

than the federal government is simply a twisted Freeper distraction.

[Cleita]

6. Oprah, although a personality is still a private citizen, however,

those churches should put their Christianity into practice. I do understand that they don't have to. On edit though, aren't they getting a bunch of tax dough for faith based charities? I think it's time the public saw this money.

[AlCzervik]

7. thats exactly right, we should be able to depend on the federal gov. the

we depend on Oprah.

[KitchenWitch]

8. Thank you!

That needed to be said!

[tuvor]

9. Aw, some people just live to bitch.

Wal-Mart does something that it "should" and people still don't like it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1745697

[DanCa]

10. I agree most of the shoulding is redirected anger.

Hell am pissed at myself for not being able to rub two nickles together so i am probably a tad more vocal than usual.