Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jay Rockefeller's Comments on David Kay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 04:23 PM
Original message
Jay Rockefeller's Comments on David Kay
Exactly right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can once again see the light at the end of the tunnel.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rockefeller just set the tone for the next BIG thing
He said that most Senators approved the resolution on the basis of presence of WMDs in Iraq, and now they are being told that there are/were none and not to expect any big surprises, and in fact, they want more money to go look for them.

He said that this calls into question the whole policy of pre-emption and that it also calls into question how our intelligence could be so wrong.

CAN YOU SAY CHALABI? CAN YOU SAY OSP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "our intelligence could be so wrong"
Our intelligence was quite correct. It was Bush*'s intelligence that was/is so flawed. Remember they didn't like the intelligence they were getting so established their own little intelligence group and it was/is a joke. Why more about that isn't being said I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NicoleM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I heard on CNN today
something about a letter Tenet sent to Jane Harman that seemed to take issue with the blaming of the intelligence community for the bad intel. If I heard correctly, he said or implied that the intelligence was fine. Leaving room for the implication that it was the way the intelligence was used that was wrong.

I could be reading way more into that than there was, so take it with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. your analysis is spot on!
tenet probably plays chess.

we know the freak monkey thinks those pieces are fancy checkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC