Turns out the Freepers hate animals, too (See how they hate)

[Modem Butterfly]

Some well-meaning soul started a thread about how to help animals. Big mistake.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1475629/posts

It's time to set these weenies straight and make them understand that an animal's life is secondary to human life.
3 posted on 09/02/2005 8:33:07 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi

These groups and their resources should be focused on saving people instead of yammering....
6 posted on 09/02/2005 8:34:19 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple

Exactly. If ONE human dies because these moonbats were saving dogs and cats, they should be charged with muder (depraved indifference).
11 posted on 09/02/2005 8:36:16 AM PDT by clee1

True liberal sentiment. I really wish my people would learn this. Dogs and cats can swim, birds can fly. and dogs will drink from a toilet bowl. My only real concern is disease from dead animals.
16 posted on 09/02/2005 8:37:56 AM PDT by Clock King

cry me a freaking river.
17 posted on 09/02/2005 8:38:22 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand

When all the humans have been helped, then we can turn our attention to dumb animals.
41 posted on 09/02/2005 8:49:48 AM PDT by RobRoy

Well, in a state of emergency, anyone expending resources on rescuing animals when people are in danger should be prosecuted.
56 posted on 09/02/2005 8:54:00 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi

Save a dog and you're going to have to give it water that a human could have.
60 posted on 09/02/2005 8:55:04 AM PDT by DouglasKC

I love BLTs: Black Lab on Toast.
70 posted on 09/02/2005 8:57:49 AM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel

In New Orleans, one ounce of effort saving animals before every human has food, water, and shelter, is criminally stupid!
76 posted on 09/02/2005 9:00:30 AM PDT by American_Centurion

Money for dogs while people are dying? Talk about misplaced priorities. Get real.
94 posted on 09/02/2005 9:05:58 AM PDT by wtc911

Um, to donate money to save cats and dogs when people are dying and otherwise in desperate need is criminal.

In times like this the only reason to save animals is to kill them to eat them.

Animals are LESS than important in this case.
154 posted on 09/02/2005 9:25:55 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus

I advocate taking resources from animal rescue to save people, in this situation.
159 posted on 09/02/2005 9:26:29 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi

[aden_nak]

1. Freeper Math: Oil > People > Animals

[Kerrytravelers]

2. I'm not a vegetarian, but...

In times like this the only reason to save animals is to kill them to eat them.

Am I missing something? We're not living in caves. We don't have to kill Rover and Fluffy here. If * and his minions would just pony up and do the job instead of smirking for photo-ops, people would have meals again.

[nonconformist]

3. I'll keep saying it.

THEY ARE SOCIOPATHS.

[sonicx]

4. freepers don't have pets?

:shrug:

[ET Awful]

5. Odd, they're perfectly fine with blowing other people up instead of

taking care of our own, but god forbid someone should care about Fluffy and Rover.

[Tom Kitten]

6. not surprised...

they have such evil little hearts, don't they?

[Zuni]

7. how can people be so heartless?

just thinking about all of the beloved pets dying there makes me feel ill

[chopper boy]

9. They make a good point though

Of course I would like to take my dog with me if a boat came to rescue me... but if I had to choose between taking my dog and taking my aunt, I'd shed some tears but I'd take my aunt instead.

[Modem Butterfly]

10. Or, your aunt could let Patches ride on her lap...

There are very few instances where it truly does come down to "choose between a person and an animal".

[ismnotwasm]

8. Stupid people

With severe personality disorders.