Crisis raises questions of race
New Orleans' poor blacks were already at a disadvantage. Could more be done to help?By MARCUS FRANKLIN and JAMIE THOMPSONPublished September 2, 2005
(excerpt)
In Hurricane Katrina's baneful aftermath, the dichotomy of New Orleans has become increasingly apparent. In image after image, the victims left to suffer appear to be mostly poor and black.
Why? Part of the answer is that two-thirds of New Orleans' population is black.
But history suggests an uglier explanation:
Black residents long ago were pushed into the swampy, low-lying lands of New Orleans, while rich white residents built on higher plots.
<snip>
To be sure, white, black, Hispanic, rich, poor, young and old suffered from Hurricane Katrina.
But it came as no surprise to disaster planners, professors and historians that New Orleans' poorest neighborhoods suffered most.
The poorest residents have long lived in the city's low-lying areas, starting in the 1830s when well-off whites built homes on higher ground near Mississippi River levees, Craig E. Colten, a geography professor at Louisiana State University, told the Philadelphia Daily News.
Since the 1890s, those lower areas have been occupied largely by African-Americans. The Lower 9th Ward, where the worst flooding occurred, is 98 percent black.
http://www.sptimes.com/2005/09/02/Worldandnation/Crisis_raises_questio.shtml