Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush says the response time was unacceptable

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:01 PM
Original message
Bush says the response time was unacceptable
Putting blame elsewhere. Now on the news they are explaining that the responsiblity was with the state governments first.

It looks fishy to me. A national emergency occurs, the president doesn't respond even though he watches people and babies dying on TV. In a state of emergency, he can break rules to save lives. He has the power. Supplies and help are withheld, there is a delay until, lo and behold Bush rides in the at same time as the National Guard brings in supplies. He looks like a hero. Evacuation is speeded up as many helicopters fly in for the refugees. (why didn't they do this at the beginning?) He makes bold and noble statements about response time not acceptable. He now will save the people and rebuild their lives.

I'll probably get deleted but I want to vent my frustration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. State governments don't have the resources - the fault is Bushs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks....this is the way it USED to be, until the BFEE took over
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 02:05 PM by Gabi Hayes
The transformation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency illustrates one way to make 21st century governance work. A decade ago, FEMA was the butt of constant jokes. Wags suggested that every natural disaster was in fact two: one when the tornado, hurricane, earthquake or flood occurred; the other when FEMA’s case workers arrived. In 1993, FEMA Administrator James Lee Witt led a radical turnaround. He restructured FEMA’s work to get checks into the hands of victims faster. He built a fast-track claim process and upgraded the information systems that process forms. Even Florida officials, enraged by FEMA’s handling of Hurricane Andrew in 1992, had little but praise for the agency’s response to storms in 1998. The key to Witt’s success lay in redefining FEMA’s function. The agency traditionally arrived after a disaster to provide emergency relief and financial assistance.

Under Witt, FEMA officials focused more on preventing damage from disasters, through intergovernmental and public-private efforts. FEMA developed a “life-cycle” model of disaster management.

Instead of waiting for a hurricane to hit and dealing with the aftermath, for example, FEMA officials worked closely with state and local officials to improve evacuation plans. They built partnerships with the construction industry to design and build hurricane-resistant houses.

FEMA, in short, moved from a limited form of direct service delivery to a complex network-based approach that stretched from the federal government into state and local governments and the private sector. Witt saw FEMA more as a catalyst than as a service deliverer. He redefined FEMA’s role and rebuilt its capacity to deal with the new role.

http://www.govexec.com/features/0101/0101s1.htm
scroll way down

oh, yeah....this was written just before they took over and replaced all the competent professionals with political hacks, pioneers, rangers, and assorted dildoes





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. How can anyone in their right mind believe the STATE gov
has the resources to deal with this? THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT can't even hardly "deal with it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush signed a document declaring the area a disaster area BEFORE
the hurricane hit, at the request of the Governor, which puts into play the federal responsibility. bush lies, but then again, what else is new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrioticLeftie Donating Member (909 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unacceptable response time?
You mean like wasting 5 whole days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush says the response time was unacceptable ....
Tell him to look in the mirror, maybe at a few pictures of himself this week playing the guitar, eating cake, on and on. Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush also boldly declares water is wet, nights are dark, and...
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 02:12 PM by JHB
predict's last week's winning lottery numbers!

Tell us something we don't already know, George! You picked the people in charge of the response, you set its budgetary priority. We reap what you sewed, George, and it is "unacceptable"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Appeared to be acceptable to him as long as he
was relaxing in Crawford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. So does he think
his response time was OK? Just wondering. He makes such a point about all his hard work and how he is our big leader man. Well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. The purpose of my rant
Is that the way the whole thing came down was make him look like such a great hero to the people. He comes in days later with guns blazing to rescue everybody. And after his appearance we have a massive rescue. Just a theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why would you be deleted?
You spoke the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Because I might sound like a conspiracy theorist n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Amazing what is state priority and what is federal priority. & what isn't.
That aside, people on the federal, state, and local governments SHARE THE BLAME.

Pinning it down to just one is stupid. Sorry. Even if it is just *, he is not the overlord (yet).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because HE didn't get the paperwork out until THURSDAY!
NO ACCOUNTABILITY!



EVER!




FUCK HIM UP THE ASS WITH A 2x4! SIDEWAYS!!

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC