Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jamie McIntyre CNN: Explaining the relief delays

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:19 PM
Original message
Jamie McIntyre CNN: Explaining the relief delays
paraphrased:

Because so many NO police left, this complicated the situation. The military had to wait for more forces to arrive. If they went in quickly they could have suffered losses. But they are upset that these cops left.

irony alert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Northern Command was the military relief --- but had to wait for bush...
he waited and people died
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's why we needed an entire army to put down the city.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. No matter how this debacle is spun, Americans now know
that when the next disaster hits in their neighborhood, whether manmade or natural, they'd better be able to take care of themselves because they can't expect their government to be there for them in their time of greatest need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just the begining
of MSM letting * off the hook....more to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. No -- he has always done that and unlike people like Brown,
Cooper, Soledad O'Brien, etc, he has not changed his tune. That's all there is to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. He is always an apologist for them.
Aaron Brown is good at subtly challenging him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think you are going to hear that the police leaving was another
pile of crap, just like the 'firing at choppers' has turned out to be. I bet the majority stayed on, this is just another sorry excuse to try and blame the people on the ground that were actually doing something. Beyond pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. and the cops blame the school crossing guards
"went in quickly"

you mean like when invading Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MO_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is just some more from
the Department of Poor Excuses. Or is the Government of Poor Excuses? w is a poor excuse for a president, for sure, as are all his appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Um, don't most disaster plans include scenarios where the local forces
... police, fire, EMT... are wiped out for one reason or another?

I mean, isn't that part of the PLANNING process?

And then, once you've imagined that possible scenario, don't you come up with contingency plans to work around it?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes!
We just had a disaster drill in our district, and one scenario we played out was what would happen if the police responders were all taken out (in our case it was due to gas leak/explosion). That was BASIC part of the drill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I thought so. And do you know what my disaster training is? Zilch!
Nada. Nothing. Zero.

Yet even I know the basics like this. So any Bush apologist presenting himself as an "expert" and spouting such nonsense needs to be laughed out of the room.

If not beaten senseless with a whiffle-ball bat. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. The whole POINT of being a disaster preparedness expert
is to be able to think of just such scenarios - AND how you would deal with them. You poke and prod at the boundaries of your combined capability and figure out where you're weak. We discovered quite a bit of stuff that we needed to fix. And we're just a little podunk school district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. What hogwash. Pure unadulterated BS because:
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 02:30 PM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
1. The police did not leave their posts until they realized THEY had been abandoned along with everyone else in New Orleans. So they have confused effect with cause.

2. There would have been greatly reduced violence, looting, etc. if the National Guard had been swiftly in place LIKE THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN.

3. We send the National Guard into F!!@#ing Baghdad for Chrissake!

4. So, they decided the violence was too much for them, but not the stranded citizens?!!!!!

5. But not too unsafe for all the great reporters who went in and out day after day. The weenie military commanders could have followed the CNN trucks or the Fox trucks or the MSNBC trucks. If they are so chickenshit then they need to be relieved of their commands. Just the every one else up the chain of command.

Or, were they stalling for other reasons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. yes it is n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Fox example.
As much as I hate to bastards - they pointed out several times, "Here we are at the supposedly "dangerous" area, and what do you see? People sitting here. People sweeping up trash because there is nothing else to do. Where's the danger? Get people in here to help!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. He's saying the US military was afraid to go into NOLA without police
protection??????

Sacramento's urban search and rescue team, specializing in water rescues, was sent to Louisianna on Tuesday. And they're firefighters. Other such teams also were sent from other parts of California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldenOldie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. He's speaking from the Pentagon - Their script his mouth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC