|
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 02:45 PM by darkstar
Pisses me off. Right the fuck off.
I've worked in and around the wetlands loss problem for a while. My expertise is not in NO scenario, but I've been to enough affiliated conferences and such that I know that this was almost axiomatic among those who did do the NOLA modeling: I fear a big, slow moving 2 or 3 more than a Cat 5."
Sure a 5 and its surge would be bad, especially given the loss of swamps and wetlands would make the equivalent of Betsy—same size, path, etc.—worse because they act as buffers to both rain and wind.
But the slosh models—those that address what’s going to be happing from the surge and the RAIN FROM THE FUCKING STORM—have always shown that 1) the counter clock winds at the west of the storm would create a tidal environment in Lake Pontchartrain including southward surges AND levee damage and 2) the rain would go on to dump after it left NO, and that water would drain—for days after—into the Miss basin from the Ohio system, etc.
Anyone who tries to sell this as two events is LYING. This was a major threat all along.
Sorry if this is old news to DU by now. I slept in my office in BR Tuesday until last night and just now got back to Lafayette and have not seen TV or checked in to DU much. My weariness has only grown to anger after 12 hours of sleep and some coffee.
sorry bout the language and typos. rage typing....
|