Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CHENEY - From the Dog House to the BIG HOUSE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 01:08 AM
Original message
CHENEY - From the Dog House to the BIG HOUSE
Cheney may be going down in Wilson intelligence scandal:

Dems need to realize that EVERYTHING Bush, Novak, and McClellan are SAYING is absolutely true. But everything they're TELLING US is a lie. We have to remember to listen carefully to the exact words.

Novak originally said that the information about Wilson's wife came from, "two senior administration officials." THIS IS TRUE.

Novak also says that, "Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak this." THIS IS ALSO TRUE.

There is ONE MAN in the world who is BOTH a senior administration official, and does not release information from the administration (from the White House).

There is ONE MAN in the world who invested his reputation and resources to the Niger yellowcake story, more than any other.

There was ONE MAN in the world who knew of Wilson's trip to Niger as well as he knew about the identity of Wilson's wife.

THE MAN'S NAME IS **DICK CHENEY**.

The yellowcake story was Cheney's baby.

Joseph Wilson killed Dick Cheney's baby.

So, when Scott McClellan talks about how "ridiculous" it is that the leak could have come out of Karl Rove, it's because he knows this statement to be true. Rove IS NOT the one who ORIGINALLY released this information. There is no way this could have been the case because there's really no scenario that would explain how Rove could legitimately be in possession of this information. But Rove is a part of the conspiracy, all the same.

The plan was for Cheney & Novak to make the info about Wilson's wife "common knowledge around Washington." That was the first wave of the attack. The second wave was initiated when Cheney told Rove that he (Cheney or his office) had put Wilson's wife's identity in print, and that she, and her identity, were now, "FAIR GAME." The rest was left to Rove. Rove, or people working with Rove, then made the FAIR GAME phone calls to the media, knowing that Cheney & Novak had laid the groundwork to cover their asses (legally) by making the secret information, "common knowledge around Washington."

The White House is trying to convince us that the Novak disclosure and the "FAIR GAME" phone calls were taking place as one continuous event, but they were not. The Novak crimes (disclosures) were designed to set up the FAIR GAME phone calls from Rove. This was a two-point plan. Novak is working with the White House on this. He is knowingly trying to mislead any would-be investigations and may eventually go down for this obvious obstruction (at least).

Scott McClellan completed the second wave on Wednesday. When asked to make a distinction between disclosing the identity of a covert CIA operative and discussing it after it is published, McClellan said, "That is such a broad question, about is it OK to discuss news articles," he said. "I mean, news articles are discussed all the time."

So, is there one top-level White House official whose email, phone records, etc. ARE NOT being protected by orders of the Justice Department? Is there one top-level White House official who does not work in the White House and whose staff is not under evidence protection orders or legal scrutiny? Is Cheney watching and laughing?

Cheney is the only top level White House official who DID NOT go before cameras this week to talk about everything he doesn't know. Dick Cheney won't be seen any time soon.

When they (McClellan & co.) say, "White House," they're actually saying, "THE PLACE WHERE CHENEY IS NOT." Notice how often they use the terminology "White House." And when Novak uses the word "identity," in talking about Valerie Plame, he's not talking about her job at the CIA, he's talking about her "identity" as Wilson's wife. It's a word game. The words are true; the message is a lie.

LISTEN TO THE WORDS THEY USE.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. The real crime
Edited on Fri Oct-03-03 01:34 AM by camero
was Novak putting it in print. If he doesn't use her name, nobody knows. She would be just an "unidentified CIA Operative".

Novak is the one who should be in prison because he is the one who "outed" her.

Edit: I think you are absolutely correct that Cheney is the source and he should be in jail also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, the REAL crime...
...was WH "officials" SHOPPING AROUND a SECURITY BREACH for partisan political gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. They both should go
Cheney more than likely made the call ( or had his elves do it) but Novak was the only one that was contacted that printed her name and therefore, he also broke the law.

If they can't find the leaker, guess who the fall guy is. The one who first put her name in print.

Both Cheney and Novak should be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hi ByeDick!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. kick
worthy of more attention from the crowd. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What does "kick" mean?
What does "kick" mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Back to the top!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cheney's getting tossed over the side — for the good of the BFEE.
... The Bush Family Evil Empire requires, on occassion, the maximum sacrifice on the part of its minions. They'll dump even their Head Minion and Big Time Fascist Brain behind the maladministration's policies, the one and not-only Sneering Dick Cheeenie.

Fortunately for us, with Sneer gone, all the Roves in the world wouldn't be able to prevent the Little Turd from Crawford going home and back to his old job as Village Idiot.

BTW: A hearty welcome to DU, ByeDick! We share the sentimenets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC