Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

People were not allowed to leave NOLA because under Martial Law....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:32 PM
Original message
People were not allowed to leave NOLA because under Martial Law....
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 09:52 PM by Jade Fox
the priority is "controling the area".

That is my understanding. I believe that is what was behind people
not being allowed to leave New Orleans, and at least partially what was
behind the delay in rescue efforts. In other words, they were not treating
NO as if the priority was helping people, but getting the area under their
control.

Anyone else have info/thoughts about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. We find out who made this decision.
And then we hold his sorry ass accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. As a decision it was unspeakable...
I'm wondering if anyone will ask the specific question: Was the decision
made to get the area under control before commencing rescue efforts?

Many people died because of that decision, if indeed it was made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ok, so which order has higher priority?
Manditory evac or Controlling area? This is a TOTAL fuck up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I believe controlling the area was made higher priority....
and god knows how many people died because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Under a sane command structure, you just do both.
Why can't you do both? Usually, people shout, "insufficient resources" like oh, not enough National Guard.

So they "prioritize". Maybe less NG got hurt for it. Maybe a lot more civvies got hurt for it. Whoever made the decision should defend it, not hide behind the Louisiana governor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So you're saying they made that decision, and made it because....
of the low number of National Guardsmen? Who would have been the
one to make that decision? thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nothing In Martial Law, Comrade
Requires such an order, or directs that decision particularly. there are a number of obvious factors that might have been considered sufficient to direct it, including doubts about destination and the possibilities of panics and tramplings and the like. It may well have been a foolish decision, but it is merely one facet of ther colossal cock-up that is the whole situation, produced by lack of competent preparation and planning, and indifference at the highest levels to the success of the endeavour to succor the city's citizens.

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks for the info.....
I can see how it was only one part of the massively poor response to this
situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC