If Clarence Thomas died from complications due to cancer during 9/11...
Tyranny_R_US
(988 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-04-05 02:10 AM
Original message |
| If Clarence Thomas died from complications due to cancer during 9/11... |
|
...would they have pre-empted 9/11 coverage to discuss his death?
Personally I don't think they would give a damn but I'd like to know your opinions.
|
| AlGore-08.com
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-04-05 02:15 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Yes, but probably not for the length of time they're spending on Renquist |
|
Because Renquist is Chief Justice, and the nuclear option hadn't been dreamed up yet. One of the reasons that they're covering Renquist is that they expect the nomination of his replacement to start the filibuster/nuclear option fight up again.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
