|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
brazil
![]() |
Sun Sep-04-05 05:07 PM Original message |
The Supreme Court can operate fine with 7 justices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Sun Sep-04-05 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. Absolutely and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tamyrlin79
![]() |
Sun Sep-04-05 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. In fact, in the early days of the Republic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danmel
![]() |
Sun Sep-04-05 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. As long as it's an ODD number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider
![]() |
Sun Sep-04-05 05:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. There is no Constitutional requirement for an "odd number"!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildflower
![]() |
Sun Sep-04-05 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Absolutely. Nominated. And another reason it should wait: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98
![]() |
Sun Sep-04-05 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. AMEN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC