|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:00 PM Original message |
Is it unusual for a new Supreme Court appointee to be named Chief Justice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. one with virtually no judicial experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockaFowler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Thank You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. yeah, like earl warren. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. especially when he's not even a Supreme Court judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kenroy (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
3. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Longhorn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. According to news reports last night on NBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kitkat65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
6. 11 out of 16 from outside the court for Chief Justice but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'm unaware of the history of this, but it sure sounds unusual to me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
8. Is it unusual for the SCOTUS to decide a federal election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Scalia must be pissed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jjmalonejr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. No, it's much more common than a promotion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerRepublican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
11. Bush wants him to preside over his impeachment hearings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
12. It's unusual for the Chief Justice to NOT be an outsider. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
13. Most of them have not been sitting members |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carpetbagger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
15. No. In fact, many are off-the-shelf politicians... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC