Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where is all the contaminated water being pumped?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:02 PM
Original message
Where is all the contaminated water being pumped?
Two years ago there was a hurricane here in VA and someone forgot to shut one of our tunnels in time so it flooded. The water had to be hauled out in tankers because they couldn't pump it into the river because it had road gunk in it. Is that the Mississippi they're pumping that water into?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. lake ponchartrain where the clean water came from. the flood did not
come from the mississippi river.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/impeachbush.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's being pumped 'away'.
With 'away' being into the Mississippi, I believe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great question.
But environmental regulations will be suspended. All that toxic junk, including 2 million gallons of oil that leaked, will end up in the gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Remember at the beginning of this when Bu$h** suspended
environmental standards? This is what it's all about.
He gets away with MURDER and then he gets away with murder again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Be Brave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. The lake, of course, is connected to the gulf of mexico. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. So that canal that the big tube pumping water
Isn't Lake Ponchatrain is it? It looks more like a river than lake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Into the 17th St. Canal
Which goes into Lake Ponchartrain.

My wife asked the same question, but I don't think that is nearly as much a problem as what residue is going to be left in New Orleans. They will have to rename it from the Crescent City to the Septic City.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Amazing! (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Yeah, but everybody's lawns are sure gonna be GREEN!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Straight into the Gulf of Mexico.
I posted a thread on this a few days ago.
Can't search and post a link now.

The Yucatan Current flows fron NO to the west.
The Florida Current flows to the east.

It is a highly toxic brew that won't "go away".
It will be with us for a long time.
I fear for our Alabama gulf coast commercial fishing, shrimping, and oystering industry.

And our tourism.
We have sugar white beaches.
What happens when the surf is "toxic"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I understand that they need to get the water out quickly
But to the detriment of the environment? Of course, that is par for the course with this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winston702 Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. #1 priority is to remove water
It would take roughly 4.5 months to treat every billion gallons of flood water. This assumes that an operational treatment system exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. What I keep wondering is
... what impact it will have on the Gulf and if there will be toxins that can be transferred to humans who eat the fish and shellfish from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hate to break it to you
But there are already toxins in our waters that are being passed on the humans who eat fish and shellfish. Our already polluted waters are effecting that. This is just going to make it, most likely, unedible from those regions and if the EPA says otherwise, I wouldn't believe them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yes, I realized that
It's the element of *if* it will be labeled as suitable for human consumption that I'm concerned about.

What test will be done, how far will the toxins reach, at what levels will they be present, and will the consumer ever know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoXN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Back in the lake, I'm sure. Don't eat the fish for a few decades.
I grew up on the Ohio river. Because of all the shit that was dumped by the steel companies back in the '50's and '60s, you're taking your chances by eating anything from the river, especially catfish, which is a damn shame, because catfish is mighty fine eatin'! My guess is that Lake Pontchartrain will be the same way before all is said and done.

MojoXN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC