Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think Bush tapped Roberts for Chief Justice because he's lazy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:29 PM
Original message
Do you think Bush tapped Roberts for Chief Justice because he's lazy?
I mean, busy with other things (Katrina)?

I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Karl told him he needed
to change the subject. GET OUT THERE NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think he didn't want to have to go through three confirmations
if he had picked someone already on the Court there would be three confirmations....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. NONSENSE! Bush tapped Roberts for Chief Justice because he's
a party loyalist who will do what he's told without question. He's inner circle and can be counted on to do the parties dirty work.

Comforting qualities in a supreme court justice.

You just fall off the turnip truck? :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fighttheevilempire Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I couldnt say it clearer myself. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, for a minute I thought you were asking if Roberts was lazy
which is the kind of quality Bush looks for in all his appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, because Bush is going to need him for Fitzgerald indictments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. This was the plan all along.. Rehnquist's death just came a bit soon..
and it could represent a window of opportunity to reject Roberts if Dems wake up and utilize it. Even by the standards of some supporters he doesn't have the experience or gravitas to be Chief Justice. Combined with the other flaws coming to light, and it a playable hand for a rejection.

Not that I expect anything like that from the opposition party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC