Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh here we go, the new talking point ....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:00 PM
Original message
Oh here we go, the new talking point ....
It's the bureaucracy not the Bush.....



Damn, who the hell do they think CAUSED the bureaucracy?

When FEMA was a cabinet position there was NO bureaucracy, that's why it was a cabinet position...But in the DHS it's a subgroup that has to have approvals, paperwork, and no money. That's why it outsourced so many jobs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Political Appointments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. That doesn't excuse Bush
Bush made no effort to cut through the bureaucracy (if it existed) in a timely fashion. No one with a scrap of decency could stand by and allow their countrymen to starve and die of thirst. Red tape should be no obstacle to a concerned President. The conclusions are obvious: either Bush didn't know or he didn't care that people were dying. Either conclusion disqualifies Bush from the moral authority necessary to a US President. He should resign now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well said!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. The other new talking point is: "Dont think about the past or the future,
think about right now". Cause they finally sent the army in.
And we are supposed to concentrate really hard on that instead of what happened the week before.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. those of us with more than two neurons can think about the past
and the future while dealing with the present. For others, it's hard work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. The buck stops at Bush. Plain and simple.
Leaders own up to their mistakes and act to fix them. Incompetent weasels make excuses and point fingers at others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secular Agent Man Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Then "Bushaucracy" will be my new talking point !
:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Heard that too. The "BIG GOV'T." Well if he can't handle the job...
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 10:48 PM by linazelle
get out of the way and let somebody who knows how to cut through red tape do it. If the POTUS can't cut the tape, who can?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. It's hard work cutting through red tape....
when you're cutting cake.


While New Orleans was undergoing a slow motion catastrophe on Monday and Tuesday, Bush was mugging for the cameras, cutting a cake for John McCain, playing the guitar for Mark Wills, delivering an address about V-J day, and continuing with his vacation. Then, on Wednesday, when he finally got around to saying something, it turned out to be a flat, defensive, laundry list of a speech.

I'm just saying...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. The creation of the Dept. Of Homeland Security...
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 10:53 PM by Fighting Irish
...was supposed to clean up the bureaucracy.

Then again, that was one of the intentions of the Patriot Act.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaq Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. They want to PRIVATIVE FEMA
...Make it more faith-based so that Pat Robertson can play the role of God in deciding who gets saved or not.

They want big corporations to take control.

Keep in mind the Bush Cult called for a smaller government, one so small that it wouldn't be able to save human lives in a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah but Bush saved thousands :sarcasm: that's the other
polly wanna cracker tid bit to poop its way onto the right wing slimosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Doesn't matter
if Bush had been there on Monday calling for NG and FEMA to hurry their asses up, and asked Congress to convene in a special midnight session (like they did for Terri), none of this mess would have happened!

Bottom line is, if Bush had stepped in and done something, people would have followed. Thats the end to that talking point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. Keep it vague and generalized. No one at the top takes responsibility
or gets indicted that way.

Look at the Plame Investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC