Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will the soon to be "dry" levee side hold after the water is pumped out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:51 AM
Original message
Will the soon to be "dry" levee side hold after the water is pumped out?
I swear I can remember before the hurricane hit someone on cable was saying that if NO was flooded they would not be able to drain it due to the way the levee was designed. The person said the "dry side" would just wash away from water being up against it from the wrong side and if they would try and pump it out the whole thing would give away and the lake would rush in. Anyone else remember hearing this? And isn't this what they are trying to do now?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. The levees I've seen are an earthen dam with a concrete wall on top
After the torrent of water, I'm also wondering if the existing levee system alone will be enough to keep the water out.

ACOE has their work cut out for them. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Raise the city.
Like downtown chicago did. Have all the tall buildings move their entrances up a floor or two. For houses, they should all be on pylons.
And tell the city to get used to being a venice some portion of the year.

After the sea levels start rising, if we want to maintain New Orleans, it'll be the only way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is a possibility.
Part of the problem now is that the levy has been weakened throughout. And the water on the "dry side" (so to speak) is actively pushing the levy back. It is acting as a support.

The levies may all collapse. Or they may not.
Nothing to do but try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. The water on both sides compromises an earthen levee..
If the levee is an earthen structure, the whole structure is possibly weakened when water stays on the dry side to the extent the water is "wicked" into the levee.

Once the water is removed from the normally dry side, the levee now has water throughout it, and slumping can occur.

This may not be in the case of the NO levees, as they may have internal structuring such as liners and concrete interior dams.

If it is purely earthen, then the failure is increased wehn the levee sits in water on both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Although I don't know this for sure, I would assume the water-side...
...of the levee is also covered by rip-rap (rocks).

This is how the Erie Canal system was designed here in NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. At first I was going to ignore your post because I thought to myself
that this is so obvious, FEMA would have thought of it. Then I realized we can't trust the government anymore because they can't plan themselves out of a paper bag. So I'm now worried about this and hope the dry side holds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mackdaddy Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. WHY did the Levees break in the first place?
I have still never heard a good explanation as to why or HOW the levees could break in THREE places at the same time!!

Yes I know they had a lot of rain/wind from the hurricane, but these things have been around a long time. The breaks were in three completely different areas, in what looks like different types of levees, some with concrete walls, some not.

And if these "special" conditions did exist, why did it break in "only" three places?

And finally what is to prevent this from happening again even not factoring in the saturated levees?

And wrapping up with a little tinfoil, Are these and many other levees all over the country now not a major terrorist target? Look how much havoc was inflicted with a levee breach which could have been accomplished with a charge much smaller that the IED roadside explosives used all over Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC