Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Katrinagate' fury spreads

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:39 AM
Original message
'Katrinagate' fury spreads

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/Hurricane_Katrina/0,,2-10-1942_1766111,00.html

'Katrinagate' fury spreads

Washington - "For God's sake, are you blind?," a woman shouts at the head of the federal emergency management agency (FEMA), Michael Brown.

"You're patting each other on the back, while people here are dying."

The woman is not a victim of Hurricane Katrina. She is a reporter with US television network MSNBC who is so affected by the misery she has witnessed she can hold back no longer.

"Katrinagate" is the term being used by the media to describe the biggest challenge facing the political establishment in the US since the Watergate affair in the 1970s toppled Richard Nixon.

Not for decades has there been such merciless questioning of the president and his administration by the US media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps the media now realize that they are US citizens as well,
thus open to the same uncaring hypocrisy as those unfortunates that they report on each night. Knocks them down a few notches, doesn't it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. No, they're part of the same "political establishment" that America is
beginning to call into question. This whole thing brings up the question: wouldn't we be better off without governing and media elites?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. ??????? "Not for decades . . .
. . . has there been such a merciless questioning of the president and his administration by the US media."

Where was this writer during the Clinton years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. remember, we are NEVER to mention Clenisgate
otherwise our credibility would come into question.

I'm waiting for the press to ask Bush what colors the freckles are i=on his penis. Then it would get up to the level of what they did to the last elected president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. About damn time. Too bad it took THIS to make it happen.
"are you blind" is a question that should have been
asked at almost every press conference for the last 5 years.

Perhaps "reality-based" news is gonna get back on it's feet.
We can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. any idea who the reporter was? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Finally!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Stop the press conferences and send someone to save us"
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. More rage from TomPaine
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/20050906/when_the_saints_dont_go_marching_in.php
snip
You want moral values? This government doesn't have them. That lack is visible in the fetid Third-World swamp we've all been watching in horror. What we're watching is not the consequence of a corrupt government or even an incompetent government. It is the consequence of an immoral government.

Morals, in case Bush et al. have forgotten, grow from the central commandment to do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Caring for others in extreme distress is the most basic tenet of morality. Doing so requires a decision to act. Our federal government decided instead to abandon those in need.

Yes, decided. Bush’s government decided—in advance—not to protect an American city from an inevitable disaster, despite years of warnings from tediously fact-based sources. Our government decided—in advance—to cut the funding that the New Orleans Corps of Engineers had requested to forestall precisely this flood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I love Tom
they're a little too gun-happy for me, but besides that they REALLY pull no punches when frankness is called for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. WOW! WOW!
That's a good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. I bet it wasn't Whorah O'Donnell
She's been on her knees since this whole thing started. I can't wait for her hard-hitting report on why Smirk's golf game last week was the right response to this tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's refreshing to see the media hasn't lost their flair for originality
Aren't the "gates" getting a little tiresome?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. There was some psychic
that supposedly predicted that a woman would create a scandal that would bring down Bush. I think we now know her name is Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Between "Katrina" and "Cindy"
let's hope either/both bring him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. "gate" just shows how completely unimaginative the media really is...
Gawd! I wish someone today in the United States professional media would have an original thought in their heads. The only time they have a breaking headline it's stolen from a foreign source or a blog.

I support their efforts, but they cheapen the efforts by not calling it what it is...The Katrina Scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. no, gate is good, it reminds us of the horrors of excess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. From Wells mouth to God's ear, I hope:
"Never before, say some observers, have US reporters been so emotionally involved in a story to the point of being enraged.

They are not just telling a story, they have become part of it.

"Has Katrina saved the US media,?" asked BBC reporter Matt Wells who sees the shift in tone as a potentially historic development.

A number of US journalists who cover federal politics, especially television presenters, had become part of the political establishment, says Wells.

"They live in the same suburbs, go to the same parties. Their television companies are owned by large conglomerates who contribute to election campaigns."

It's a "perfect recipe" for fearful, self-censoring reportage, he says, but thinks "since last week, that's all over".

(snip)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Its about damn time, considering their help in getting us here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. wouldn't "Floodgate" be more appropriate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Well the floodgates have been opened
and the neo-con ideology will be drowned in the cesspool they created.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. Of for fucking hell's sake, who's the asshole who called it a gate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. KATEGATE is easier to say and we know exactly

who is responsible!
BUSH GOTTA GO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC