could save lives, in this STILL on-going genocide.
Bush said he would ask the countries, including Israel who also offered doctors with medical supplies, for cash money "that we take care of our own." think it was MSNBC article the headline says that Condi will accept help but the chimp says only "cash money".
~~~~~~~~
http://dailykos.com/story/2005/9/5/42722/21410Doctors banned from helping Katrina Victims
by AHiddenSaint
Mon Sep 5th, 2005 at 01:27:22 PDT
It is late here and I'm about to head to bed, but this story is scary. I'll try to stay up to see a few responses and change this dairy if need be, but the moderators at dailykos I give permission to delete if this dairy is a repeat or change if need be in order to help the information. What matters most is that these facts get out and people see them.
Victims of Katrina might have been helped, but red-tape kept the doctors who wanted to help out.
Among the doctors stymied from helping out are 100 surgeons and paramedics in a state-of-the-art mobile hospital, developed with millions of tax dollars for just such emergencies, marooned in rural Mississippi.
"The bell was rung, the e-mails were sent off. ...We all got off work and deployed," said one of the frustrated surgeons, Dr. Preston "Chip" Rich of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
AHiddenSaint's diary :: ::
"We have tried so hard to do the right thing. It took us 30 hours to get here," he said. That government officials can't straighten out the mess and get them assigned to a relief effort now that they're just a few miles away "is just mind-boggling," he said.
While the doctors wait, the first signs of disease began to emerge Saturday: A Mississippi shelter was closed after 20 residents got sick with dysentery, probably from drinking contaminated water.
How many lives could have been saved if these doctors were allowed in to help Katrina victims?
"How crazy is that?" he complained in an e-mail to his daughter.
Dr. Jeffrey Guy, a trauma surgeon at Vanderbilt University who has been in contact with the mobile hospital doctors, told The Associated Press in a telephone interview, "There are entire hospitals that are contacting me, saying, 'We need to take on patients," ' but they can't get through the bureaucracy.
"The crime of this story is, you've got millions of dollars in assets and it's not deployed," he said. "We mount a better response in a Third World country."
Could this be one of many reasons why the response to Katrina was so bad?
As hurricane survivors died along roadsides and at shelters where they were told to take refuge, or pleaded for food and water or a ride to an overcrowded shelter, members of Congress called for hearings to find out how the response to this disaster could have failed so badly when the nation has spent unprecedented billions of dollars in the name of homeland security.
But the answer may not be much of a mystery.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency, once a powerful independent agency focused solely on responding to earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and other natural disasters that occur on average about four times a month, was placed within the huge Department of Homeland Security after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Homeland Security sends $1.1 billion each year to states to combat terrorism, but $180 million to help prepare for such disasters as Katrina. Much of the terrorism grant money is given under conditions that specifically exclude spending it on items or personnel that would be used in responding to hazards other than terrorism.
Could this have been prevented?
On the sixth day of disaster and despair, an urgent new problem erupted: disease. A suspected outbreak of dysentery compelled authorities in Biloxi, Miss., to hurriedly evacuate hundreds of people from a shelter. Medical experts have warned of epidemics sweeping through crowded, unsanitary shelters.
Thousands were believed dead throughout the region, and authorities said dozens were dying each day from the cumulative effects of Hurricane Katrina.
How many is the question?