Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Criminal Plot Underway in New Orleans Swamp-Disneyification of New Orleans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:06 PM
Original message
Criminal Plot Underway in New Orleans Swamp-Disneyification of New Orleans
Criminal Plot Underway in the New Orleans Swamp
It is mighty suspicious the New Orleans "refugees" (as the corporate media call the Americans removed from the disease-ridden swamp left in the wake of Hurricane Katrina) are being relocated far and wide. Most of them will probably never return and will end up in ghettoes in Baton Rouge, Houston, and elsewhere (it appears Baton Rouge is being groomed as an expansive slum, since the rebuilt New Orleans will be a casino and tourist destination with time-share condos and luxury housing). It should be noted that the usual suspects will "remove debris" and supposedly "restore electric power" and "repair roofs" (an absurd declaration, considering many if not most of the homes in the New Orleans swamp will be condemned). "The Navy has hired Houston-based Halliburton Co.," the Houston Chronicle reported on September 1, well before the current effort to "rescue" and "evacuate" those not killed outright during the storm and afterwards, as Bush was on vacation and FEMA twiddled its thumbs, allowing as many residents as possible to die before people who actually have a conscience and are not neoliberal sociopaths began to scream and demand Bush be impeached for criminal negligence. "Halliburton subsidiary KBR will also perform damage assessments at other naval installations in New Orleans as soon as it is safe to do so," that is to say after the "refugees" have been relocated in distant slums. "FEMA privatized hurricane disaster recovery planning for New Orleans and Southeastern Louisiana. The firms that received the contract are big GOP contributors," writes Wayne Madesn.* For some reason I am not surprised.

As for the hardy who have stayed behind, determined to rebuild their lives and city, expect the swamp of New Orleans to be declared a health hazard and the remaining residents (or poor and middle class residents with no stake in the new corporate Las Vegas on the Mississippi) to be removed by the National Guard and Army at gunpoint. "On the sixth day of disaster and despair, an urgent new problem erupted: disease. A suspected outbreak of dysentery compelled authorities in Biloxi, Miss., to hurriedly evacuate hundreds of people from a shelter. Medical experts have warned of epidemics sweeping through crowded, unsanitary shelters," reports Knight Ridder.

"By early Saturday morning, buses had evacuated most people from the frightening confines of the Superdome," notes al-Jazeera. "At the equally squalid convention centre, thousands of people began pushing and dragging their belongings up the street to more than a dozen air-conditioned buses, the mood more numb than jubilant." It is obvious the fiasco that was the Superdome -- in essence a prison where old people and babies died from neglect and gangbangers roamed free to terrorize, murder, and rape -- and the convention center are designated departure points for depopulating the ruined city. Abandoning people at these departure points -- sans water, food, or medical care -- was part of the psychological warfare plan: people are desperate to escape these two fetid and disease-ridden prisons and are thankful to be relocated, probably to never return. Most of them are unaware their homes will be bulldozed by Halliburton and the land sold for pennies on the dollar to corporate developers.

<snip>

http://kurtnimmo.blogspot.com/
.....................................................................................................................................

* http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
September 4, 2005 -- WMR contacted by spokesperson for James Lee Witt. Yesterday, WMR reported that according to a June 3, 2004 press release from Innovative Emergency Management (IEM), Inc. it received a FEMA contract to develop a "Catastrophic Hurricane Disaster Plan for New Orleans & Southeast Louisiana." The IEM press release stated that among its team partners was James Lee Witt Associates. Witt was FEMA director under President Clinton and he restored that agency's disaster recovery effectiveness after President George H. W. Bush's ineffective response to Hurricane Andrew in 1992. According to Witt's spokesperson, James Lee Witt Associates continues to be fraudulently listed on IEM's web site as a team partner for the over $500,000 FEMA contract work.The IEM press release that contains the erroneous information has been disappearing and reappearing, another sign of something suspicious with the contractor.

IEM, which is an 8-A minority-owned firm, apparently used Witt's name as a "buy in" ploy to lock in the FEMA contract. What is fishier is that the IEM press release was reportedly sent out before the FEMA contract was actually awarded. After IEM began the work on the FEMA contract, it never once used Witt's company and did not pay it one cent. Informed sources claim that IEM, owned by a big donor to the GOP, is notorious for not completing work after contracts are awarded. The Catastrophic Hurricane Disaster Plan for New Orleans and Southeast Louisiana was no exception. Mr. Witt is now acting as a pro bono disaster recovery adviser for Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco. Witt's spokesperson was frank is stating, "you don't really think the Bush administration would have given a contract to someone who worked for Bill Clinton?" That is very true. The issue with the incomplete FEMA hurricane preparedness plan is in IEM's and its actual partners' court. James Lee Witt, likely America's most effective FEMA Director, had nothing to do with the IEM work and he now needs all the support the nation and state of Louisiana can muster as he prepares to confront America's worst natural disaster in its history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick. Everyone nominate this for greatest. We want people to know what
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 08:12 PM by genius
the Bush Administration is up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Watch it happen
Those evacuees, even the families who have called NOLA home for generations, will never live in the New New Orleans. Not only will they be unable to afford it, the new residents of New New Orleans will be white.

High rises. Golf courses. Condos. Polystyrene French Quarter replica. And no color other than fake plastic architecture.

Disneyfication, indeed! Watch it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yep. Gentrification
It is criminal. I have suspected this for a while. Some of those people know it also. That is why they are refusing to leave. I don't blame them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here is a thread about a group that is trying to fight this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's time for everyone to read or reread Naomi Klein's Disaster Capitalism
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050502/klein


"Last summer, in the lull of the August media doze, the Bush Administration's doctrine of preventive war took a major leap forward. On August 5, 2004, the White House created the Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization, headed by former US Ambassador to Ukraine Carlos Pascual. Its mandate is to draw up elaborate "post-conflict" plans for up to twenty-five countries that are not, as of yet, in conflict. According to Pascual, it will also be able to coordinate three full-scale reconstruction operations in different countries "at the same time," each lasting "five to seven years."

Fittingly, a government devoted to perpetual pre-emptive deconstruction now has a standing office of perpetual pre-emptive reconstruction....

In January Condoleezza Rice sparked a small controversy by describing the tsunami as "a wonderful opportunity" that "has paid great dividends for us." Many were horrified at the idea of treating a massive human tragedy as a chance to seek advantage. But, if anything, Rice was understating the case. A group calling itself Thailand Tsunami Survivors and Supporters says that for "businessmen-politicians, the tsunami was the answer to their prayers, since it literally wiped these coastal areas clean of the communities which had previously stood in the way of their plans for resorts, hotels, casinos and shrimp farms. To them, all these coastal areas are now open land!"

Disaster, it seems, is the new terra nullius."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. wasn't there also a scene in F9/11 where business folk
were talking up the great economic possibilities available in the invasion of Iraq?

Anyone with a functioning heart and brain is coming to realize that making obscene profit for themselves is all that BushCo is interested in.

And if you, your mama or your neighbors, the babies you hold, the grandparents you cherish or anyone in the world has to die for it, the message is:

TOO FUCKING BAD. GET THE FUCK OVER IT, AND YOU BEST STAY THE FUCK OUT OF OUR WAY.

I wish that what I write here was hyperbole. It is not.

Time to wake up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkyisBlue Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Disaster Capitalism by Naomi Klein
Good article.

After reading this, it makes clear why the levees in New Orleans weren't strengthened. These vipers wanted the levees to break so that they could rebuild the waterfront land in their own image: big and gaudy. They will make tons of profit off this calamity, and best of all, the taxpayers will pick up the tab to do most of the hard work!! The levees will be rebuilt with state-of-the-art technology to withstand any punishment mother nature can dish out (paid for by you and I), and the land will be sold to developers. The people who once lived there will never see their land again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Witt thing reminds me of...
"The secret deal involves a complex transaction to transfer ownership of as much as $57 billion in unpaid Iraqi debts. The debts, now owed to the government of Kuwait, would be assigned to a foundation created and controlled by a consortium in which the key players are the Carlyle Group, the Albright Group (headed by another former Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright) and several other well-connected firms. Under the deal, the government of Kuwait would also give the consortium $2 billion up front to invest in a private equity fund devised by the consortium, with half of it going to Carlyle."

http://www.nologo.org/newsite/detaild.php?ID=422

Democrats have their people (Albright) jumping in and capitalizing on disasters and such - playing off their previous jobs just like the Republicans. Makes me wonder if that is part of what Clinton (Bill) is up to with his "PR" relief campaign. Smoothing the way for friends, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I had a feeling!
I got out of bed last night to write a post about how this all looks very fishy. We have to make sure all the people who were taken away to other States, and the dead are not forgotten! The Democrats are working behind the scenes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. Thanks for that story, your theory sounds correct.
Too many on our people got taken by the Clinton PR. I'm glad we had a popular president but he shoudln't have any undue influence on the party. Like an overly ambitious wife, as an example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. ... the rebuilt New Orleans will be a casino and tourist destination....
As I said previously at DU:

The indignity is just beginning. Why? Two words: eminent domain.

Once the waters have receded, it will be decided that the highest use to which the land can be put is casinos. Expect the poor, in many cases, never to return home. Where they once lived will be casinos as far as the eye can see. Does anyone want to bet (so to speak) that Frank Fahrenkopf, president of the American Gaming Association (what they call gaming is what everyone else calls gambling) and former chairman of the Republican National Committee, isn't making all the necessary phone calls to bring this about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The land has already been divied up, just like the oil fields in Iraq
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 09:59 PM by BrklynLiberal
were split up in January of 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. The author seems to be speculating.
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 09:30 PM by snot
The evidence is that there's a Halliburton contract (pretty common lately) and that the poor were traumatized and scattered.

I think we all have these suspicions, and I think they should be voiced; but I'm not sure it helps our credibility to state as fact what I believe is still just speculation, that "the rebuilt New Orleans will be a casino and tourist destination with time-share condos and luxury housing." I have not seen any direct evidence of this yet, and it doesn't appear to me that the author mentions any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. OK. you print out this thread, save it some place safe, and then read it
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 10:02 PM by BrklynLiberal
when this all comes true. It won't be that long.

The only way it will not come to pass is if The Peoples Hurricane Fund stops it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Like I said, we're all wondering. I just think it helps
to distinguish between facts and speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Original post and posts 4 and 5 DO contain facts.
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 10:52 PM by DLnyc
I wouldn't say that the statement that BushCo gutted FEMA for profit is 'speculation'; I would call that obvious. Specifcally, these posts, assuming they check out, are evidence of what any reasonable person already assumed to be true: that FEMA was gutted for profit--in terms of salaries paid to political hacks who do no useful work, other than 'image management', and in terms of fat contracts for companies who do only token work and typically funnel some profits into donations to politicians who were/are/will be instrumental in awarding those contracts.

I agree that we have yet to see what utterly offensive and despicable use these guys are planning to make of this disaster, I don't see evidence here that any PARTICULAR plan is underway. But as far as what SORT of issues BushCo is focused on right now, I would say they are focused on PROFIT and, sorry, I don't need any evidence for that . . . that's a given!

(on edit:)

Also, isn't the fact that Halliburton has already been awarded a contract evidence that SOMEBODY has some plans in mind as to what will be done? And shouldn't decisions like that really be made by the people of New Orleans and Louisiana, rather than by fiat by a group that has time and again proven itself to be shamelessly criminal and corrupt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. I agree--the facts he state support for, well, he state support for them.
It's just that a lot of folks in this thread reacted strongly also to things s/he states as conclusions and provides no support for.

I think most folks here would consider me oriented toward the more-left, more-paranoid end of the DU spectrum. I think I was one of the first to speculate about lucrative contracts coming out of this situation.

But nothing matters more to me than determining and spreading the truth, and our ability to do that is undermined if we're sloppy.

Please bear in mind also that many DU'ers strongly suspect that one tactic sometimes used by Repub is to plant horrifying, semi-plausible but ultimately false stories that they hope we will pick them up, and then they can use them to "Rathergate" us, burying any substantive truth with an attack on our credibility.

I don't say we shouldn't be alert to the possibilities and check them out. I just don't think we should bet our credibility without at least a bit of direct evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Yes, spread the truth. But which truths are most important?
I agree that spreading the truth is perhaps the most important thing we can do. I'm just saying that the wider truth, that the criminals now in power almost ALWAYS spin and rob rather than do anything useful, might be more important than trying to nail down the exact details of how they are spinning and robbing in this PARTICULAR case.

The thing is, it seems to me they repeatedly manage to direct debate towards whether particular charges of their crimes are accurate and away from the idea that the number of crimes is becoming astronomical and away from the real alternative of throwing them out and/or into prison.

Insofar as the grotesque crimes in this case are seen in the context of a constant web of criminal behavior, I think we are making progress. Insofar as arguments focus on this case as the only charge, as if these guys are squeaky clean if this charge doesn't stick, I think we are stuck in the mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I guess it will take about 2 years for the ACTUAL construction of the NEW
New Orleans to begin, so it would take about that long for proof positive, unless you know someone involved in the planning end.

Of course the possibility exisits that someone will leak the plans before that, and it will be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Louisiana could stop it now, maybe.
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 11:24 PM by DLnyc
on edit, adding "(BushCo)" and "(LA and NO)":

I would think, given the current state of public opinion, that if LA and NO officials stood up today and insisted that they (LA and NO) should have control over any rebuilding contracts it would be pretty hard for BushCo to fight that, especially since their (BushCo's) performance on the disaster end makes most halfway sane people a little queezy contempolating their (BushCo's) performance on any reconstruction.

Actually, leaders (and/or puppets) in Iraq tried to object to BushCo controlling all the contracts there, if I recall, but basically were told to shove it. Which brings up some questions:

1. If this is how they perform when American lives are at stake, how do you suppose they have been performing when 'only' Iraqi lives are at stake?

2. Could this be why a lot of Iraqis are REALLY PISSED OFF at us?

3. Given how they've performed in Iraq and in LA, wouldn't we all be a lot safer if they were doing hard time in prison, instead of running our country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Here is a thread in which the people are trying to take back control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not to worry, their land still belongs to those poor folks...
They can't condemn their land and just take it.

Can they?

Well, maybe there might be some sort of "emminent domain" action, but that is highly, highly unlikely. And even if there was, the owners will certainly be justly compensated at "fair market value".

Won't they?

Whether that land has any value or not prior to reconstruction is another matter, I guess.

Oh, I suppose we shouldn't forget that many of these poor folks will be accumulating debt as they try to reconstruct their lives in a new city, and will be just thrilled when the guvmint throws a few crumbs their way for their "worthless" land.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joebert Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
33. Nope, they get nothing.
What is fair market value for ruined land, under water?

Eminent Domain is now the law, and has been extended to the government seizing private land to be given to another private party in order to increase the tax revenue generated by that land.

Therefore, they could write checks for $50.00 a person right now, clean it, rebuild it (at our expense) and then large casino types can come in, and will get tax breaks for creating jobs in the region.

Nice how that works out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. Couldn't the mayor and others use eminent domain...
not to help these developers move in, but to keep them OUT, and only allow those in to build replacement low-cost housing for those that got pushed out? You would think that most local city officials wouldn't want this sort of takeover to happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. "local officials" are probably in on the deal. They will be getting kick
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 11:14 PM by BrklynLiberal
backs. They NEW New Orleans will be a goldmine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. But one would think that one would still have enough former
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 11:22 PM by calipendence
residents there that would throw such local officials out on their rears for doing something so offensive. It's one thing to have local officials be on the take in a city where there aren't pent up volatile emotions boiling below the surface, but I would like to think that these officials would be conscious of how such a move might be political suicide for them. I think it would be important for the residents that are there and still are registered voters there to express their opinions as such. I guess a big question is how long some folks that have been "displaced" from there (that still might own property there) and those who have rented up until recently still are considered registered voters there. I would think that if some folks had already paid their rent for this month, they should be considered residents at least through the end of September, should they not?

Also, we from outside can influence things there too. Many of us can boycott New Orleans as a tourist spot, if they don't allow those who've lived there all their lives to be represented by those officials deciding what to do with the property that's still there. We should ban together and commit to boycott that area unless an effort is made to rebuild the housing for those former residents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. The only hope may be The Peoples Hurricane Fund,discussed in this thread:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beetbox Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. keep on kicking
there's a reason no official will be fired(like FEMA stooge "Brownie").

they were following orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Gentrification has been going on for a long time... but this was the
"trifecta" for the land barons. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Maybe like DisneyWorld, they will try to create the town of "Liberty"
right in New Orleans....:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
27. one more kick before I sign off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brack Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
30. IMO
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 12:38 AM by brack
This is a done deal already. Let's say you are a homeowner in one of the less fortunate areas of a major city. Your home is wiped out and you have nothing. Then, a few months later, a 'developer' offers you a pittance for your home (possibly with tax monies designated for the 'relief' effort) You're staying in The Astrodome in Houston, you have more or less nothing, you've accepted a job at the local Walmart, or some fast food place, but of course that's not going to provide food and shelter for your family. So you are FORCED to practically give away the little you have for way less than your former homes value. The little bit you get will be enough to get you into an apartment in a low income area.

Then, they level the area, put their resorts, casinos, and whatever up. And then watch how secure the levees are after that.

Consider also the fact that the areas that are the biggest lure for tourists. Bourbon St. The French Quarter, etc. are still intact. That alone makes this a cash cow for the 'have mores' that will take advantage of this.

This will be a few months down the road, when the majority of Americans have pushed Katrina into the recesses of memory and start worrying again about who some celebrity is fucking, or some girl that's missing.
The tragedy in NOLA is genocide by capitalism, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
32. The problem I have with this kind of report
is it seems to be encouraging folks not to leave their homes for fear of the Disneyification of their land.

And to stay could be lethal if there is not clean water, and the air is becoming diseased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
35. You're going to see the same thing happen . . .
an hour after Fidel dies.

It's all about CONSUMPTION, DADDY-O!!

Who cares about culture? Who cares about history? Who cares about heritage? THERE'S CASH TO BE MADE!!!

And people wonder why Dumberica is going in the shitter strapped to a rocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC