Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tinfoil? US Navy ship in Caribbean jamming NOLA radio comms (-Madsen)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:12 PM
Original message
Tinfoil? US Navy ship in Caribbean jamming NOLA radio comms (-Madsen)
Tinfoil Time

For the past couple of days Wayne Madsen -- ex-NSA spook, computer privacy activist and freelance investigative journalist -- has been banging the conspiracy drum about alleged efforts by the federal government to jam radio frequencies or otherwise interfere with emergency communications in the hurricane zone.

This is, of course, an utterly fantastic claim -- but if it is fantasy, it's quite detailed fantasy:

we now have a new unconfirmed report that the culprit may be the Pentagon itself. The emitter is an IF (Intermediate Frequency) jammer that is operating south southwest of New Orleans on board a U.S. Navy ship, according to an anonymous source. The jamming is cross-spectrum and interfering with superheterodyne receiver components, including the emergency radios being used in New Orleans relief efforts.


-- Billmon, 5 Sept 2005


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Slit Skirt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. there have been quite a few reports
and threads on this...wmr would only be a secondary source...there are many more than just he
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Communications blackout
I believe that was the plan, control and contain anyone found in the region. They don't want the body count numbers to become public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fantasy of a peculiarly ill-informed kind.
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 08:30 PM by Davis_X_Machina
The author has no idea how receivers work.

Last time I looked the various ham radio disaster nets on 20, 40, and 80 meters were going great guns.

There were some problems early on with interference to 14.265 MHz, but it wasn't widespread, and wasn't of the magnitude that Marsden describes.

The IF of modern radios are usually 455 kHz and 10.7 MHz, and I am not aware of any suddenly-appearing stations on those frequencies. It would take enormous signals to jam the IF of a receiver at any distance, as opposed to the frequency its front end was tuned to.

Interested folks could look here. (eHam.net)

73
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Anyone qualified to vet this rebuttal?
I don't know anything about radio myself.

Saying that it would take "enormous" signals doesn't seem like much of a rebuttal - I assume if US black ops is doing this their jamming system would be far more sophisticated than anything most mortals are aware of.

And saying that the ham radio disaster nets on such-and-such meters were going "great guns" doesn't seem to rebut the many reports of communication breakdown cited by Madsen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. To disrupt a receiver hundreds of miles away...
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 08:40 PM by Davis_X_Machina
...by interfering with its IF would require a signal in the tens of megawatts. That's a power range consistent with the largest land-based SW broadcasters -- Voice of America, BBC, etc.

Shipboard -- ain't gonna happen.

You could do it with a few kW if you simply put a signal out on the actual frequency in question. Several orders of magnitude easier.

There simply aren't any significant complaints in the ham community about QRM on the scale Marsden reports.

73

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. I'm an RF Engineer, and I play one on TV, too.
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 08:08 AM by BiggJawn
That quote from Madsen is just so much bullshit. He throws in terms like "Intermediate Frequency" and "Superheterodyne" and that's supposed to make the Average Joe got "Wow! He knows his shit!".

The effect on someone who actually fucks with this stuff for a living AND grins and giggles is "Oh, that's like saying 'Jimmin' at the Jam-Jam, klopping at the Frotz, and it shorts out the Frammistat'..."

Even the "Spooks" have to follow the Laws of Physics.

I have a healthy suspicion of ANYONE identified as a "former NSA spook".

The communications problems were because some municipalities, not learning the lesson of NYC, still rely on cellphone-style trunking systems or actual cellies, there's STILL no intercommunications between agencies, and, I'm sorry to say, it seems that all the rich white folk, who comprise most of the Ham Radio operators, headed north and there was nobody left in the disaster area...

But I SERIOUSLY doubt the Navy was offshore, operating some kind of waterborne "jammer"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B3Nut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. Little good it would do...
...to even attempt to jam 455KHz, since you'd just be disabling AM radios. It would shut Rush Limbaugh and ballgames up, but that's about it. :D Well, that and regular shortwave...since the SW sets I've had used 455KHz...

10.7 is IF for standard FM radios...not sure what VHF communications radios use. I mainly tinker with older hi-fi gear and beat-up old Hammonds, so I'm not an RF eggspurt by any means...

Todd in Beerbratistan, lover of glowy glass bottle thingies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. BullCrap!!
Rampant tinfoil paranoia. A ship in the Caribbean is jamming NOLA local radios? From that great distance? And the rest of the world doesn't notice anything????

Electronics doesn't work that way.

That tinfoil hat is making the rest of us look silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Do we know what US black ops radio capabilities really are?
Maybe they are stronger and more targeted than we could ever imagine.

Remember, if this kind of technology is being developed by US black ops, it must be HIGHLY classified.

This high-tech hacking seems like JUST the kind of stuff Rumsfeld, Poindexter and the other joystick generals in the bowels of DARPA might be interested in.

This electronics newbie would be more convinced by a detailed, patient explanation of how and way "electronics don't work that way" rather than an essentially contentless rebuttal.

"And the rest of the world doesn't notice anything??" Well, yes, we've actually been hearing a LOT about communications being interfered with in NOLA - specifically a Parish President in NOLA complained that FEMA had shut down his lines. The Parish President had to station armed guards to keep the FEMA thugs out.

Seen in the context of the dozen or so well-documented cases over at DailyKos and Constructive Interference where FEMA inexplicably blocked civilian and local/state material aid from reaching Katrina victims, it wouldn't surprise me at all if they were running a few high-tech SigInt ops alongside good old-fashioned sabotage on the ground.

FEMA blocks 500-boat citizen flotilla from delivering aid

FEMA fails to utilize Navy ship with 600-bed hospital on board

FEMA turns away generators (See entry from 3:32 P.M. by Ben Morris, Slidell mayor)

FEMA: "First Responders Urged Not To Respond" (No, this is NOT an Onion headline!)

In summary: these cases of MATERIAL sabotage are definitely not tinfoil - they are bizarre and fantastic but also corroborated by many eye-witnesses.

So, given all we know about the high-tech proclivities and capabilities of this current Pentagon, it seems rather premature to simply yell, "No, they would / could never do THAT!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Laws of physics...
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 08:55 PM by Davis_X_Machina
...pretty much determine that "No, they would / could never do THAT!"

Strange signals -- certainly anything of the magnitude reportes -- would be reported places like here within hours.

There are lots of ears listening.

73
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Black ops CAN'T change the Laws of Physics.
Those laws are above mankind's ability to change.

I have a degree in math with a minor in physics, and used to teach electronics.

Get the appropriate degrees and I will discuss this with you. Until then I will dismiss it as a conspiracy theorist's fantasies of desire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not speaking to Madsen at the mo'
He accused DU and DailyKos of being in on it.

I think his little red choo choo has gone round the bend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. Madsen had the most wild theories about the election, too.
Diebold and op-scan being manipulated at the central tabulator I can see, but he had it tied into every suspect Bush scheme and some I've never even heard of. It was bizarre.

I consider Octafish to be the resident authority on plausible conspiracy theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ahhhh Wayne Madsen
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 08:38 PM by Walt Starr
Never has there been a more wretched hive of wacks and tinfoilhat nuttery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I've always been very impressed with Wayne Madsen's articles
Just expressing my two cents' worth here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh really?
Have you ever seen one that panned out to be true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Well, I've also liked a lot of your posts Walt, so I'm conflicted here
Let's look at two of the more tinfoily propositions laid out by Madsen:

Anthrax and the Agency
Thinking the Unthinkable
http://www.counterpunch.org/madsenanthrax.html

An Israeli / Rove Connection?
The McGreevey Scandal
http://counterpunch.org/madsen08142004.html

What was the disposition on these? (The jury may be out on both of them - but all I can say is that, to me, they seem highly probable.)

And as I said, reports of jammed radio signals do seem right in line with EYEWITNESS reports of FEMA cutting a Parish's communication cables, and blocking many deliveries of "assets" to NOLA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSchewe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. He should come out with his own brand: Madsen's Wrap n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. I agree. Madsen and tinfoil are synonymous from what I've seen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. THINK PEOPLE: This is untrue and is very easy to disprove
Cross-spectrum jamming would disrupt a wide range of communications.

As we all know the national guard and louisiana police radios work fine, people have been listening to them on the on-line scanner stream for many days now. That in and of itself disproves the story.

Also, cell phones work and television communications have worked too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Your Logic and reason has no place in the Bush Years, Be GONE.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. after everything we have witnessed this past week i would not be surprised
it does amaze me that some here think the GOV would NEVER do such a thing after all the blocking of aid and physical cutting of emergency comm lines that local authorities had to place armed guards around to secure.

:shrug:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. Locking...
This story comes from an unreliable source.
If you find a mainstream news source, please
repost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC