Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How was the levee really destroyed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:37 AM
Original message
How was the levee really destroyed?
If it had failed in other areas on the lake side what other communities would have been destroyed?

I really want to find out how the levee really broke. Something to me seems fishy about the levee break.

What are they covering up about this levee situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. By a lack of funds ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. ROVE BROKE THE LEVEE!!!
OMG I saw him do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. now let's be sensible -- it was space aliens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. psssst
No. It was those guys from the UN in black helicopters who are trying to start a world government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. sounds like a conspiracy theory to me -- I'm sticking with space aliens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. well, they're ignoring the recent history of people dynamiting levees
in order to divert floodwaters away from their own property.

http://www.salon.com/april97/columnists/carville970407.html

And, of people patrolling levees and shooting those who might be threats to do that ("contractors"?)

If one wants to approach this from a scientific or forensic point of view, we'd have to keep open any reasonable possiblity including terrorism and locals diverting floodwaters via explosives or other methods.

On the other hand, if we simply want to engage in prejudice (prejudgment), faith-based thinking and attitude, we'd ridicule certain possibilities from the get go as "tinfoil" and accept any plausible explanation as plenty of reason to 'move on'.

It's a good thing our prosecutors aren't as pollyannish as some of the anti-tinfoil folks here. On the other hand, certainly lots of tinfoil theories shoot themselves in the foot by jumping from "entirely possible" to "this IS what happened folks!" That of course is the same investigational mistake made by those willing to accept any seemingly plausible reason as sufficient to move on and think no more about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. My friend said that he heard this at work.
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 07:43 AM by Tesla
That right before the levees broke, choppers and on the ground ,Police and NG reported hearing, "Charges being set off".BAM,BAM.
When I asked where he heard that or seen it, he said it was live on TV the morning the levees broke.

Any news feed on that?

I think one report was from the 17th St levee.

He said alot of people were talking aboout it at his work.
I personally didn't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:47 AM
Original message
Me too
IMHO, it broke because of lack of funding to fix it.

Again, IMHO, too many people died in NO, if somebody blew it up, there would be too many people reporting in the local media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
10.  that sure is a chain of rumors there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. You don't believe that a Cat 5 could knock out a levee...
designed to only withstand a Cat 3 hurricane?

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. Top winds in New Orleans were 100 mph, not even a CAT 3
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 09:01 AM by Land Shark
so the proffered explanation by the Corps of Engineers (weather exceeded engineering specifications of Cat 3) is not accurate.

It doesn't matter if the hurricane was Cat 4 or 5 SOMEWHERE ELSE.

On edit, you don't see a lot of leveled buildings in New Orleans, do we?? Katrina was a LOT weaker there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. And your alternate explanation would be...?
So, if the cat 3,4,5 hurricane that hit NO, together with the southern flow of water from Lake Ponchatrain down the canal didn't cause the breach at 17th street, what are you suggesting did cause it?

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. It was the Bilderburgers!
:tinfoilhat:

Shit happens, OK?
Didja hear of the report done LAST YEAR that says the levees wouldn't hold up to a Cat THREE storm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CascadeTide Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. There is a precedent
In 1927 the levees in the poor sections of town were dynamited to relieve flooding in the wealthier parts of town. This time around pretty much everywhere was flooded so I don't see a clear pattern of intent with that motive but I can understand people being suspicious since it has happened before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. My dad said he met an evacuee in Houston that said his wife called
after hearing some booms and water rushed into their home.

The evacuee hasn't heard from his wife or kids since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Actually, the levees were dynamited south of N.O in 1927
After consulting with teh people there and promising to pay for the damage, so as to spare N.O.

After the flood subsided N.O. reneged on its promise to pay for the damage south of N.O.

"Rising Tide"...I forget the author's name but its a great read about the Missississippi River's recent history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CascadeTide Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Some people were compensated
Those with influence were, those without didn't see anything, much like what's going to happen in this aftermath...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. People can always screw up a job, but the French Quarter & Garden District
were both largely unflooded, or relatively unflooded. NBC this morning had a feature on a millionaire lawyer in the Garden District (all mansions) refusing to leave. Wasn't flooded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. See this other DU link, houses of the Gentry spared & power generators
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. Yeah, amazing how that works, eh?...
How gravity makes water settle in the low lying areas, and how higher ground stays dry.

"In New Orleans, income and elevation can be correlated on a literally sliding scale: the Garden District on the highest level, Stanley Kowalski in the swamp. The Garden District and its environs are locally known as uptown"

http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2005/08/30/mcphee/index_np.html

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. I heard that a hurricane had something to do with it...
but don't quote me on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. hmmmm...you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. i watched the levee break the night after katrina on cnn.....
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 07:54 AM by mrbill
It started out as a little hole. All you needed were some little dutch boys with helicopers and sand bags on the scene. Some bulldozers would also have been nice.

How many movies are there about people trying to fix the breech in the levee. At least they try.

Nothing ever happened, the calvary didn't come for days and the hole got bigger and bigger and the water got slowly deeper and deeper.

Somebody in charge doen't watch CNN or let it happen on purpose.

Even if a quick fix didn't work, it would have looked like somebody was trying.

Then why no warnings? It wasn't like a tsunami, more like the water slowly rising. The folks in charge didn't seem to realize that water runs downhill.

on edit: spell check harpy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. .
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 07:54 AM by SidDithers
nevermind

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. It was HAARP!
HAARP I tells ya!

Damn Hawaiian American Retirees are always up to no good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. NPR was talking about a tidal wave in the 9th Ward
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 07:56 AM by supernova
much like a tsunami, and maybe 20ft+.

Since people have had some time to survey the damage, some have speculated that a tidal wave hit the 9th ward.

Clues:

* Impossibly fast rising water (within 30 minutes water was already 8 ft in some places.

* Multi-ton Barge brought inland. It was in the canal.

edit: Here's a link to the story

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4838668
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I said it was "Watercooler"!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. I listened to that piece this morning too. It makes sense. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. three levees failed, that I know about
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 08:03 AM by rfkrfk
Industrial Canal, East side of the canal, possible barge collision

...


London ave. canal, West sideof the canal, just south of
Robert E. Lee Blvd, failed



17th St canal, East side of the canal, at Spencer ave, failed

these two, were thin canal wall types, not 'wide' levees

another issue with these two is that there are no floodgates to close,
at the lake

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. One reason - FEMA DIDN'T SEND THE HELICOPTERS
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 08:06 AM by DoYouEverWonder
that Nagin requested for shoring up the 17th Street Levee.

They told him they were coming and then they told him that the HELICOPTERS were DIVERTED.

Nagin had the sandbags, all he needed was the FEMA's HELICOPTERS. Even then sandbagging might not have been enough, but they should have at least made the attempt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
23. Here's one theory
http://www.rense.com/general67/loose.htm

People around here have varying opinions about Madsen, I know.

There were also quotations from survivors swearing that they heard something that sounded like explosives. Who the heck knows?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. I'm still sticking with space aliens
or perhaps just maybe the levees broke because they were not adequate to handle the Hurricane, who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. I prefer to blame
everything that goes wrong on the "baby sacrificing, blood sucking, shape shifting reptilians."

I much more fond of aliens than those guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
24. Reality Check Time...
I accept the U.S. Corp of Engineer's original finding of levee failure...and how this flooding might have been fait accompli no matter how strong the system was.

The deal that screwed New Orleans was the fact the main storm surge...that huge wall of water that destroyed Gulfport and Biloxi, as well as all that rain rushed into Lake Ponchatrain. Not only did the water levels rise, but a reverse surge occured pushing water toward New Orleans and it's "western" or southern bubrs of Chalmette and St. Bernard Parish.

The water in St. Bernard...which is just as bad and devestating as New Orleans wasn't caused by levee failure...that was the lake reclaiming the once lowlands that have been replaced by nursing homes and shopping malls.

The 17th street levee was compromised from the bottom up. The pressure of the water surging into the New Orleans canals in that surge (Sunday night/monday morning), held on most the canals (such as the ones in Jefferson Parish that didn't breech). The 17th street on was holding, then the foundation under the levee wall began to erode and that's what took a section of the canal down and the flooding was on. The argument is that levee was compromised with the building of new roads in the area and that the funding approved in '98 for upgrading the situation could have seen that wall replaced (it was known to be vulnerable) but we know what happened to that money.

I don't think this break can be covered up. There's tons of science that can and will explain what happened and it's pretty straight forward. This flood went almost exactly as the "doomsday" scenarios that were played out in many books and disaster drills. There was a PBS special earlier this year that all but explained how the levee system was vulnerable and how a devestating flood would destroy the city. We're seeing self-fulfilling prophecy created by a regime stuck in its own little world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
31. according to the ACoE, the first levee to go...
... was punctured when a barge rammed it. This was the Industrial Canal levee, and the resulting flood drowned the Ninth Ward long before other parts of the city flooded.

I am not sure why a barge was left in a position to destroy the levee while an immensely strong hurricane was bearing down on the area. That has not yet been explained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC