|
My working hypothesis is that, whatever Bushites say, think of the exact opposite, and you're probably close to the truth. They are NEVER telling the truth. They are ALWAYS lying. And, when they go out of their way to plant a story like this in the "news," they have something they're trying to cover up. It is misdirection.
The story has a very weird feel, probably written by Karen Hughes. For instance, consider the phrase "You know, kind of a nester." That's women's language. Men don't use that word--"nester." Least of all a dimwitted, callous blusterer--"all hat, no cattle"--like Bush. He simply wouldn't pick up on a word like that from current lingo. It's a new usage--in fact a "Lady's Home Journal" kind of word. That's why I think a woman wrote it. Think of that "Vampira" (Hughes) in HER nest, on the night of 9/11, cozying in with her hot cocoa and her cat, and thinking of all the blood she's going to be able to suck over the next few years.
"I knew I had to deal with the issue the next day." The issue? 9/11 is an "issue"? Well, that's how the venomous brain of a Bush Cartel propagandist might think of it. How do we we deal with this "issue"? How do we spin it to our advantage? Ah, by the presinitwit projecting an image of "strength and comfort to the country." They may have been drilling Bush with that phrase. (I think they have coaching sessions with him, in which they try to make some simple ideas stick in his mind--similar to brainwashing.)
Oct. '03. Hm-m. Invasion of Iraq in March '03. Spring/summer hunt for WMDs. No WMDs. Opposition to the war back up to nearly 60% in opinion polls. Bad shit just went down, that will require more coverup--big risk of treason charges against many Bushites. The outing of Valerie Plame, in July '03, is the context in which this "interview" was scripted. It's my guess that the "good" CIA, the ones working in our interest, and the Brits chief weapons expert, David Kelly--who was likely "suicided" also in July '03--may have foiled a Bush Cartel plot to plant WMDs in Iraq. The Bushites had Judith Miller all set up and in position to "find" these phony WMDs and to "get the scoop," possibly as a reward to her for all she'd done for them. I don't think the Bushites were just sitting around idly, hoping she would find some. I think they had a plan to plant them, and, given what all happened next, that Plame (outed) and Kelly (suicided) were somehow involved in Judith Miller coming up empty-handed.
I'm trying to think when Tenet quit and passed the Plame outing onto a prosecutor. I think it was a bit later (spring '04?), but it was in the wind (who would take blame for no WMDs being found). Also, I believe Oct. '03 was when the torture scandal began to threaten the regime.
So the purpose of this phony interview of George and Laura may have been merely to take us back to 9/11, to reemphasize it--as part of the overall PR campaign to keep emphasizing it whenever any crap about Iraq came up. Its purpose is obviously, also, to associate 9/11, war and terror with images of "nesting," comfort, ordinary life. A little bit of domestic humor. Ozzie and Harriet. The bad bogeymen cannot ruffle this cozy American couple. He's got a full day at the office the next day. She's in her fluffy slippers and just a little bit of a scatterbrain who can't find her contacts. (How did she find her slippers?). Manhattan in ruins. The Pentagon still smoking. Thousands dead. Not to worry. The presidential bed is occupied, at least for part of the night.
What Bush was really doing is anybody's guess. To savvy readers, this precious little cameo is hardly comforting. In fact, it sends chills down one's spine to think how difficult his handlers have made it to get at anything even close to the truth.
There is also a more subtle psyops aspect to the story. One of the goals of the rightwing coup that we have suffered--it seems to me--is to reverse the "Vietnam syndrome" (the American peoples' revulsion at unjust war, and tendency toward fairness and justice), and also to reverse the "New Deal" mentality (75 years of social progress--workers rights, etc.) by inuring people to torture and mass slaughter (coarsening our sensibilities), and by forcing us to accept rule by the rich, in its rawest, ugliest form. I'm think of moments like Bush looking under the Oval Office rug for WMDs--making a joke of the slaughter of over 100,000 people--and addressing a dinner of fat cats by saying that these "have's" are his "base." And, more recently, his eating birthday cake with John McCain while New Orleans was wiped off the map and thousands of people were dying. All recorded, all on camera. Not hidden. (These are not arbitrary images or messages--they have a point.)
This utter callousness drives us crazy on the left. That may be one of its intentions--to inflame us, while of course rendering us increasingly powerless and literally disenfranchised (for instance, by their gaining control of the election system--Bushite companies counting all the votes with SECRET, PROPRIETARY programming code--I mean, how audacious can you get?).
If you are in a constant state of rage at this ugly Bush image--and at the radically altered and very ugly image of America that is thereby projected to all of us and to the world--and can't do anything about it, then you are a slave. Constant rage. No way out. Constantly provoked--provoked beyond endurance. Yet you have no say, no power, no way to fight back.
George and Laura having an endearing little humorous moment on the night of 9/11 may have been consciously intended to, a) penetrate the minds of the uninformed, the non-savvy, with the notion that thousands of Americans falling to their deaths or being incinerated is not such a big deal (just another yawn in our fat and happy lives as consumers--an "issue" that the powerful will "deal with"); and b) to provoke, enrage and disempower the better informed, the more savvy (which in my opinion is the majority of Americans) (--based on study of a range of opinion polls over the last year, which utterly contradict the stereotype of Americans as having moved to the right, politically, or as lazy, stupid and gullible.)
The latter group--the vast majority of Americans (60% to 70% disapproval of every major Bush policy, foreign and domestic)--has been a real problem for the Bush Cartel and the rightwing "think tanks." That's why they had to gain direct control over vote tabulation--and why they have to make up shit, like this George/Laura "interview." But I have great faith that the American people will ultimately triumph over this Cartel, because of its essential emptiness. The bottom line of the Cartel is greed. They have no beliefs--and, really, no interest in governing, just in looting. The looting that they had in mind is so massive, that they had to use psyops and tricks, and employ "think tanks" and neo-cons, to pull it off. It is THOSE operations that we are beginning to see more clearly--the image-making, the attempted brainwashing. But it is all just window dressing for callous, cold-hearted and murderous theft. The rightwing "think tanks" may have had a grand plan for transforming American society (a la Hitler's "Mein Kampf"--the "Project for a New American Century" and all that). But I don't think the real powers behind all this do. What THEY are doing is creating opportunities for grand theft--theft on a scale the world has never seen before--such as they just did in New Orleans. (--billions and billions more of our tax dollars to Halliburton, Bechtel, Fluor, et al).
|