Cause of delay: Bush wanted to send troops in under the Insurrection Act!

[tk2kewl]

This was poster in LBN last night and did not get a whole lot of attention. Scary stuff! :scared:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1765390

[whatever4]

1. Yup

That's why they had to "build" this disaster.

Had to make people mad and hateful. So they'd rise up. Had to make this a muddled mess, so the lack of direction turns toward the government in general.

Then they have an excuse to turn troops on us. Legally.

Those same troops used to shooting up families in cars in Iraq.


People keep on forgetting, these monsters make profit from war. Any war. Even a war here. WAR is money.

Just like it's been since the beginning. Follow the money. Sounds crazy until you put dollar signs on it. Then, it all makes sense.

[tk2kewl]

2. and they were so sure that all those poor people would go nuts...

but they kept there cool and exposed * for the inhumane animal he is

[swimboy]

3. I wondered about this when Brownie was on and on about

"well, I haven't heard there were riots, everything must be working fine, after all, there are no riots" etc. It sounded like baiting to me.

[The Backlash Cometh]

4. So the Insurrection Act would have given Bush full power over

the contracts to subcontractors like Halliburton? Do I have that right?

[leesa]

5. This is what they wanted and STILL want...they want us to rise up so they

can declare their dictatorship.

It's been a real eye opener over the last 6 years to discover how many fascists there are in America. I will never look at upper management in the same way. This is a corporate adventure from start to finish, stolen elections, 9-11, Afghanistan/gas pipeline, Iraq/oil, Katrina/insurrection clamp-down/real estate boon