Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So they're blaming NWS, NHC and NOAA now? Proof of the budget cuts.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 01:33 PM
Original message
So they're blaming NWS, NHC and NOAA now? Proof of the budget cuts.
http://www.agiweb.org/gap/legis108/appropsfy2005_commerce.html

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
The proposed funding for NOAA in FY05 is $3.3 billion, an 8.2% decrease from last year's appropriation. Within NOAA, the majority of the research is managed by the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR), which is slated to receive a 12% decrease, leaving the program with a total of $350 million. Under the President's FY05 budget request, the National Ocean Service (NOS) would receive $394.3 million (down 22%). The National Weather Service is slated for a 3% increase, bringing the total to $749 million.

NOAA's budget slashes funding for the "wet side", which includes the NOS and OAR. Programs in NOS that will receive less funding than last year include: Navigation Services (down $15 million), Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment (down $80 million) and Ocean & Coastal Management (down $31 million). In OAR, the Ocean, Coastal and Great Lakes Research program was cut by $50 million. The Weather and Air Quality Research program was cut by $20 million. However, the Climate Research Program requested $13 million more than last year.
--snip--
Congress passed the Commerce, Justice, State, and the Judiciary FY05 Appropriations bill July 8th without offering any amendments that would boost funding for the severe cuts to NOAA. The amount appropriated by the bill for NOAA is $2.3 billion, a decrease of $543 million from the FY04 enacted level and $215 million less than the President's requested amount. With overall funding cut by 36%, many one-time, non-recurring projects will be terminated. Funding for ocean and fisheries programs received the most significant cuts, while many of the atmospheric programs remain funded at the president's requested levels. In cutting NOAA's funding, the Committee went against the recommendation of two reports published earlier this year by the Pew Oceans Commission and the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. Both reported that significantly higher levels of funding were necessary for ocean and coastal protection and research.

Full 2005 budget available here:
http://www.publicaffairs.noaa.gov/budget2005/



Sorry assholes, this doesn't hold up either, you cut the funding here too... It's all criminal negligence anyway they spin it!!!!

:nuke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
walkon Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hate the Government
Love their cronies.
Grover Norquist in action - Operation Shrink and Drown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow! Talk about shooting the messenger!
I wasn't aware that these agencies had anything to do with levee management or evacuation/first response planning.

Well, who needs to know where a hurricane is going to go or how strong it is anyway? It's God's will after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC