Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Novak now in violation of the Identities Protection Act?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 04:03 PM
Original message
Is Novak now in violation of the Identities Protection Act?
I remember Corn, in his initial article, noted that journalists are exempt from outing an agent if they do not show a pattern of behavior which includes this outing.

So, when does something become a pattern of behavior?

Back in July he outed Ms Plame.

As of yesterday, from what I've read on this forum, he went on to out the company she worked for...in order, again, to try to discredit her, rather than look at the seriousness of the possible blowback from his action of outing her in the first place.

So, is two times a pattern?

I really wish the man would just shut his mouth, but if he won't, it seems someone will need to take action to keep him from further compromising national security issues in order to cover his own behind, and those who gave up this CIA operative to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. He might be exempt from criminal prosecution but I read yesterday
where the Wilsons were planning civil litigation. I would be quite worried if I were Novak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't understand why Novak would do this
unless he is trying to show the world that the friends of the Bush administration can do anything they want--that they are above the law.

The same thing goes for the person who is leaking this information to Novak. It is as though this official in the Bush administration is saying that the Bush people are untouchable--even by the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sleep easy Bob, Why it's only the CIA. You're a big man and...
you can make blood enemies of the CIA, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. What he did yesterday
Edited on Sat Oct-04-03 04:11 PM by DoYouEverWonder
blows my mind. First he invokes the 5th Amendment on his own show and then he in print he provides even more gory details this time from her W2 (how the hell did he get to see that) and outs the company she used for a cover? Way to go Bob.

When is CNN going to force him to resign before he destroys the entire CIA?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. How the hell would he have gotten hold of the information
on her W-2? And why does CNN keep providing a forum for Novak? Why don't they give him a leave of absence or something? That guy from the CIA, Larry (I can't remember his last name) was on CNN earlier this evening and was all over the news chick about them letting Novak just come on whenever and talk and talk and talk. She said that whe wasn't sure CNN had done all that. And he said, you keep giving him a forum for all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. NOvack has quite a history of being a GOP shill and an asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I actually feel sorry for Novak.
The front company was pretty much outed at the same time as Valerie Plame's name.

Probably every country concerned about her ran her name everywhere they could.

Novak, though, brought it out into the open and the CIA is smashing him with it.

Novak has forgotten rule #1: Do not mess with the CIA.

He might as well give up his names because his career is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think it depends on whether Section b or
Section d takes precedence or if both have to be proven. If it is either one then Novak is in deep trouble as he has definitely violated Section d, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. thanks
I'll have to go back and look up the act because I don't remember what those sections are about, although I assume one of them is about the journalist issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Man, I heart you, RainDog,
You always stay on top of the MOST significant points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unknown Known Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Could Wilson possibly file an injunction against NoFacts and/or CNN
to force Novakula to SHUT THE FUCK UP!

CNN is setting itself up for a major lawsuit because they continue to let this clown keep talking. What's up with that? I don't understand why CNN would allow this in order to protect him. Bizarro World:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC