freepers are going to claim it's the local government taking guns from NO

[noahmijo]

My response to that is the fact that given that we have on the ground Iraq War Vets doing the confiscating and the federal branch is doing NOTHING to stop this, and the NRA is suspiciously silent about the whole operation....

What do you guys think?

[CottonBear]

1. The Inderdictor blog guy posted: tear that page out of the constitution &

move out of the state. he's a former special forces soldier. He said if it's not going to be enforced (right to bear arms) then it's all over in LA. He and his internet crew were invaded by 82nd Airborne soldiers in their high rise internet stronghold. Scary.

http://www.livejournal.com/users/interdictor/

[VPStoltz]

4. Good. Let them have their fucking guns.

Then we'll know who to blame if the violence continues.

[eleny]

2. If they do - ask them this...

And what did W do to stop it?

[raising2moredems]

3. Just depends on who has the guns I guess

I think this situation is a "file for later use". I suspect they are not there because the NRAs sheeples are at least 95% white male which explains the token female prez. My Pappaw was an NRA member until he died 10+ years ago and I will have nothing to do with them.

[Joebert]

5. The order came from a local, right?

The Feds aren't confiscating the weapons as a policy.

The Federal troops on loan to the locals may be though.

And, as the article this all spawned from said, the rich folks, and the private security won't be asked for theirs. Therefore, the NRA has nothing to worry about since it's obviously poor, non-donors that will be affected.