Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did they "overestimate" N.O. death toll to permit upbeat headline spin?...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:09 AM
Original message
Did they "overestimate" N.O. death toll to permit upbeat headline spin?...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, FEMA was not counting all the bodies because they
thought they could keep reporters out and hide the truth.

Watch what happens now that the court has ordered them to allow the reporters in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. I doubt they overestimated the death toll. Notice this news came
out after the crackdown on the media. I suspect the numbers won't be counted correctly. :tinfoilhat: I hope the media rebellion will ensure this doesn't happen.

I HOPE the number was overestimated. I'd much rather fewer people lost their lives, but something about this stinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. In a way, numbers are irrelevant, because any loss is so sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. More people died in Katrina than any other tragedy in the US
with the exception of wars.

No matter how they fudge the numbers, thousands of people are dead, and that is a big deal.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. True, but public perception will be influenced by the spin, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Either way, I certainly hope that it is much lower
But I don't trust them to do a legitimate count so I'm glad they have to let the media in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarojin Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Current is 118
But they have reported on well over 1000, and with all those flooded houses, it is going to be very bad.

Sounds like spin to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Was 312 this morning
for all of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, real upbeat headline
"Only 5,000 people killed by Katrina"
"Officials call it a miracle"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. MSNBC had 1,500 rescued kids listed without parents
I'm sure Bush will list 30 adults dead and declare it a miracle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Conservativesux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bush will count Blacks as 3/5th's of a person to lower the death toll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Unfortunately, I think that is his mindset
I feel so sorry for those 1,500 kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Conservativesux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. .
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 02:46 AM by Conservativesux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. calif paper said today governm ordered 50,000 body bags..todays paper!
http://www.modbee.com/local/story/11196519p-11948351c.html

Modesto company to deliver more body bags to New Orleans
The government's order for another 50,000 will be filled by about eight firms


By PATRICK GIBLIN
BEE STAFF WRITER


Last Updated: September 9, 2005, 04:24:14 AM PDT

snip:

The federal government is trying to purchase an additional 50,000 body bags for use in the Hurricane Katrina cleanup and in Iraq, according to an official for a Modesto manufacturer.
Previously, the Federal Emergency Management Administration purchased 25,000 body bags and shipped them to New Orleans.

"We recently delivered every bag we had in stock, which is about 400," said John Hassapakis, manager of Central Valley Professional Services in Modesto. "Those were sent directly to New Orleans."

This week the government put out a bid for 50,000 more bags, he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. All day yesterday they were saying 25,000 body bags. The Rove spin begins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Is this in order to spin it as miraculous when the bags are not needed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. 10,000 or 100,000, corpses are all tragic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. No. At this time, we have no idea what the toll will be.
Hopefully, the estimates were wrong and fewer people are dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC