|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
wakemewhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 01:09 AM Original message |
Did they "overestimate" N.O. death toll to permit upbeat headline spin?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. No, FEMA was not counting all the bodies because they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
2. I doubt they overestimated the death toll. Notice this news came |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 01:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. In a way, numbers are irrelevant, because any loss is so sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melodybe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 04:19 AM Response to Reply #2 |
16. More people died in Katrina than any other tragedy in the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 12:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. True, but public perception will be influenced by the spin, sadly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
3. Either way, I certainly hope that it is much lower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarojin (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
5. Current is 118 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 01:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Was 312 this morning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagingInMiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
7. Yeah, real upbeat headline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
8. MSNBC had 1,500 rescued kids listed without parents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Conservativesux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 02:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Bush will count Blacks as 3/5th's of a person to lower the death toll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 02:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Unfortunately, I think that is his mindset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Conservativesux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 02:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 02:48 AM Response to Original message |
12. calif paper said today governm ordered 50,000 body bags..todays paper! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 02:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. All day yesterday they were saying 25,000 body bags. The Rove spin begins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 04:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Is this in order to spin it as miraculous when the bags are not needed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BikeWriter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 02:51 AM Response to Original message |
14. 10,000 or 100,000, corpses are all tragic! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-05 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
18. No. At this time, we have no idea what the toll will be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC